Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
The building operations in 1840 were entirely carried on by means of
two cranes with moveable jibs, of which one was fixed just beyond the
foundation, at the place shewn in Plate III., between the landing quay
and the Tower, and was chiefly used in bringing forward the materials;
and the other, placed in the centre of the Tower, served for laying
the stones, and was raised along with the rise of the building. So
perfectly had the stones been dressed in the workyard at Tyree, that
no alteration or paring of the beds or joints was required; and such
was the facility afforded by the building apparatus, that by working
14 hours, we occasionally _set_, through the activity of Mr Charles
Stewart, the foreman builder, so many as 85 blocks in a day. The first
course of masonry was laid by means of a wooden trainer; but the place
of all the subsequent stones was, as already noticed, regulated by the
use of _plumb-templets_, whose inner faces were arcs of the generating
hyperbola. By those means we succeeded in _setting_, in a most perfect
manner, six courses, which carried the building to the height of 8
feet 2 inches, and contained a mass equal to 10,780 cubic feet. That
quantity is not greatly less than the whole materials of the Eddystone
Lighthouse Tower, which, according to my computations from the drawings
of SMEATON, do not exceed 13,300 cubic feet, and is somewhat more than
_one-third_ of the contents of the Bell Rock Tower, which are about
28,500 cubic feet. That frustum was also nearly equal to _one-fifth_
part of the whole mass of the proposed building, which is about 56,000
cubic feet. Of the six courses, the first three are of Hynish gneiss,
and the rest are of granite from the Ross of Mull. The comparative
merits of those two materials may be stated as follows:--The Hynish
stone is harder, and susceptible of finer workmanship, and perhaps its
most perfect blocks are more durable; but it requires much more labour
in dressing than the Mull granite, which is more homogeneous in its
structure and is not intersected by hard veins, like those which occur
in the gneiss of Tyree. There is good reason also for concluding that
the Mull stone is sufficiently durable, because it contains but a small
proportion of micaceous matter, and in its texture closely resembles
some of the blocks of St Oran’s chapel in the neighbouring Island of
Iona, which have resisted the action of the weather, it is believed,
for more than 600 years and still retain the marks left by the tools of
the workmen. I had also carefully compared the density of the Hynish
and Mull stones, by weighing blocks of known dimensions, and found that
it requires 13·16 cubic feet of the former, and 13·66 cubic feet of the
latter to weigh one ton, a difference much less than the appearance of
the stone would lead one to expect. A Tower of the dimensions of that
at Skerryvore, built entirely of Hynish stone, would have weighed about
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account