Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
will be the relative index of _refraction_ for the two media.
4. It may perhaps be added, for convenience, as a _fourth_ law,
deducible from the others, that since rays passing from a dense into a
rare medium, have their angle of refraction greater than the angle of
incidence, there must be some angle of incidence whose corresponding
angle of refraction is a right angle; beyond which no refraction can
take place, because there is no angle whose sine can be greater than
the radius. In such circumstances, _total reflection_ ensues. For
common glass, whose index of refraction is 1·5, we have (in the case of
emergent rays) sine of
sine of refraction
incidence = ------------------;
1·5
but, as no sine can exceed radius or unity, the angle of incidence must
be limited to 41° 49′; beyond which total reflection will take place,
and the light will return _inwards_ into the glass, being _reflected_
at its surface.
Thus, if a ray proceed from a point O (fig. 48), within a piece of
glass, to a point C, at its surface A B; and if O C _b_, its incidence,
be less than 41° 49′, it will be _refracted_ in some direction C _f_;
but if this angle be greater than 41° 49′, as O C′ _b′_, the ray will
be _reflected_ back into the glass in the direction C′ O′.
[Illustration: Fig. 48.]
The material hitherto employed in the construction of lighthouse
apparatus is crown glass, which, although it possesses a lower
refractive power than flint glass and has, besides, a slightly
greenish tinge, offers the great practical advantages of being more
easily obtained of homogeneous quality; and, being less subject to
deterioration from atmospheric influences, it is peculiarly suitable
for use in the exposed situations generally occupied by Lighthouses.
The refractive index of crown glass, as already noticed, is about 1·5.
Any one may easily satisfy himself by a careful protraction of the
angles of _incidence_ and _refraction_, in the manner above described,
as to the truth of the following general propositions resulting from
those laws:--
1. A ray of light passing through a plate of some diaphanous
substance such as glass, with parallel surfaces, suffers no change
of _direction_, but emerges in a line parallel to its original path,
merely suffering a _displacement_, depending on the obliquity of the
incident ray, and the refractive power and thickness of the plate. The
effect of this displacement is merely to give the ray an apparent point
of origin different from the true one. This will be easily understood
by the diagram (fig. 49), in which _a b_ is a normal to the plate,
whose surfaces _x x_ and _x′ x′_ are parallel, _r r r r_ shews the path
of the ray, _r r_ the displacement, and _r′_ the apparent point of
origin resulting from its altered _direction_.
[Illustration: Fig. 49.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account