Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
5_th_, That the extinction of one lamp in a revolving catoptric light
is not only less probable, but leads to much less serious consequences
than the extinction of the single lamp in a dioptric light; because, in
the first case, the evil is limited to diminishing the power of _one
face_ by an _eighth part_; whilst, in the second, _the whole horizon
is totally deprived of light_. The extinction of a lamp, therefore, in
a dioptric light, leads to evils which may be considered _infinitely
great_ in comparison with the consequences which attend the same
accident in a catoptric light.
~Summary of considerations as to the fitness of the two systems for
Fixed Lights.~
In comparing the fixed dioptric, and the fixed catoptric apparatus, the
results may be summed up under the following heads:--
1_st_, It is impossible, by means of any practicable combination of
paraboloïdal reflectors, to distribute round the horizon a zone of
light of exactly _equal intensity_; while this may be easily effected,
by dioptric means, in the manner already described. In other words,
the qualities required in fixed lights cannot be so fully obtained by
reflectors as by refractors.
2_d_, The _average_ light produced in every azimuth by burning
one gallon of oil in Argand lamps, with reflectors, is only about
_one-fourth_ of that produced by burning the same quantity in the
dioptric apparatus; and the annual expenditure is L.140, 3s. 8d. less
for the entire dioptric light than for the catoptric light.
3_d_, The _characteristic_ appearance of the fixed reflecting light in
any one azimuth would not be changed by the adoption of the dioptric
method, although its increased _mean_ power would render it visible
at a greater distance in almost every direction; the only exception
being in the azimuths opposite the axis of each reflector, where the
catoptric light has an _excess_ of power equal to about 50 _per centum_.
4_th_, From the equal distribution of the rays, the dioptric light
would be observed at equal distances in every point of the horizon; an
effect which cannot be fully attained by any practicable combination of
paraboloïdal reflectors.
5_th_, The inconveniences arising from the uncertainty which attends
the use of the mechanical lamp, are not perhaps so much felt in a
fixed as in a revolving light, because the greater simplicity of the
apparatus admits of easier access to it, in case of accident.
6_th_, But the extinction of a lamp in a catoptric light, leaves only
one _twenty-sixth part_ of the horizon without the benefit of the
light, and the chance of accident arising to vessels from it, may,
therefore, be considered as incalculably less than the danger resulting
from the extinction of the single lamp of the dioptric light, which
deprives the whole horizon of light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account