Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthousesStevenson, Alan
History
Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse : $b with notes on the illumination of lighthouses
Stevenson, Alan
Skerryvore Lighthouse (Hebrides, Scotland)
The difficulties of estimating the deepness or sharpness of the shadow
is very great, and many persons seem quite incapable of arriving at
any right judgment in this matter. The same person also will discover
such unaccountable variations in his decision after observations made
at short intervals of time, as, one would think, can only arise from
a sudden change of the intensity of one or both lights. M. Peclet, in
his _Traité de l’éclairage_, gives, as the result of his experience
(and I can fully confirm his result by my own), that those differences
depend less frequently on any real difficulty of estimating the
deepness of the shadows, than on variations in the position of the
observer, or rather in the angle at which he views the shadows, and
that, consequently, in proportion to the distance between the two
shadows, this source of error is increased. Any thing like a glossy
texture of the surface of the screen, which then, of course, becomes a
reflector, also tends to aggravate this evil. Thus, if the two lights
which are to be compared be placed on a table, in such situations as
to spread pretty far apart on the screen the shadows of a vertical rod
placed between them; and if the shadow nearer to the observer seem to
be a little deeper or sharper than the other, let the observer look
at them from the other side of the table, and their difference will
be reversed, and that which seemed the paler, will become the deeper.
Again, if the difference between the two shadows be very great when
seen from the right side of the screen, it may happen that, on viewing
them from the left hand, the difference may still be in favour of the
same shadow, but in a much less degree.
“When I observed this effect,” says M. Peclet,[84] “I tried to view
the shadows through a transparent screen, but I remarked the same
variations. They were indeed even more sensible; for a variation in the
distance of the eye of a few centimètres, made a prodigious change in
the deepness of the shadows. I observed also that the shadow was much
deeper when seen in the line of the light, and that in every other
direction, it became paler in proportion as the eye receded from that
direction.
[84] Traité de l’éclairage, p. 214.
“In all the cases which I have just described, the differences of
the tints when the position is changed, increase in proportion as
the shadows are farther separate; and they grow very minute when the
shadows are almost touching each other.
[Illustration: Fig. 95.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account