After the War: A Southern Tour. May 1, 1865 to May 1, 1866Reid, Whitelaw
History
After the War: A Southern Tour. May 1, 1865 to May 1, 1866
Reid, Whitelaw
Plantation life; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877); Southern States -- Description and travel
On the other hand, there are constant dissentions here, and charges
against each other of improper practices among the Government officers
themselves. The military men abuse the Treasury agents roundly, accuse
them of enormous speculations on their own account, and the most
unwarranted system of spying into the operations of others.[24]
[24]The tax Commissioners, and other civil functionaries, fare little
better; while the military men, according to the stories of the
civilians, believe the modern substitute for glory to be—“loot.”
All accounts, both here, at Jacksonville and at St. Augustine, agree
that the country contains little more than is needed for the sustenance
of the inhabitants. Trade may come by and by, when Florida begins to be
used again as a grand national sanatarium; but for a year or two, the
openings for business with the Floridians are likely to require very
little of the capital now looking for Southern investments.
There was a parting tune from the band as we left General Gillmore’s
boat, kindly good-byes with General and staff officers. Altogether the
pleasantest party met, thus far, on the trip. The “Wayanda” fired a gun
as she began hoisting her anchor, and we were off for a sail of five
hundred miles, along what used to be considered the most dangerous coast
of the United States.
-----
Footnote 24:
An account in the Port Royal _New South_ of an April-fool performance
at Fernandina (said to be a literal record of an actual occurrence),
is greatly gloated over by the military authorities, as a specimen of
what they call the meanness and imbecility of the civil officials. It
illustrates, at least, the state of feeling between the services. The
account sets forth that a Mr. Goodrich had brought into Fernandina,
from Nassau, a small schooner, in ballast. The Collector had
suspicions of intended contraband trade. He was stimulated by
pretended disclosures, to the point of bringing Mr. Goodrich before
the Provost Marshal for an examination. The _New South_ proceeds:
“Mr. Wells testified that Mr. Goodrich had, in a season of friendly
confidence, exhibited to him, at his house, a pipe of whisky, which he
admitted having brought on shore from his schooner, after dark, and
without the knowledge of the Collector of the Customs, the said pipe
of whisky being ignored in the vessel’s manifest; and that Goodrich
further disclosed that he had two more pipes in the house, that would
be brought into requisition when this was exhausted.
“Mr. Goodrich admitted that he had no witnesses to examine, and very
little to say in his defense, but he would like to interrogate the
witnesses who had testified against him. Permission being granted, the
following conversation ensued:
“_Mr. Goodrich_—Do you swear positively, Mr. Wells, that you saw the
pipe of whisky?
“_Mr. Wells_—I do, solemnly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account