Poetry -- 20th century -- Periodicals; Short stories -- Periodicals
The drama at the Gymnase seemed to me rather a pitiful effort at
sensation. There is but one way of treating a priest upon the stage,
and it is by placing him in juxtaposition with a woman. He is rarely
allowed to be interesting in any other shape. Among actors there is a
superstition that regards every play with a priest in it as “unlucky.”
The cleric is supposed to “hoodoo” the drama. If I were a playwright I
think I should elect to be on the “safe side.” I should take no risks,
for very rarely does a priest-ridden drama succeed. “Ces Messieurs”
certainly seems to be a case that justifies the actors’ superstition.
The heroine of the piece is a young widow, who, after the loss of her
husband and child, has given up mundane pleasure. She lives in the
provinces, with a large and singularly talky family, and has “taken
up” religion. Upon the scene comes the _Abbé Thibaut_, a young priest
with good looks and even better intentions. He is eloquent and mystic;
_Henriette_ interests herself in him immediately, and gives him funds
for his schools and benevolent institutions. _Thibaut_ is ambitious,
and he needs the money. The man and woman are soon embroiled in an
“affair,” though they are both unconscious of that fact.
Other priests occur. One--the villain of the piece--reports _Thibaut_
to the other, a benevolent Monsignor, who is displayed in a luxury of
“monsignor” robes. Pettiness, intrigue, jealousy, hatred, malevolence,
are ascribed to the _Abbé Morisson_, who is as deep-dyed a villain as
one could wish to find in the Third Avenue Theater or the Grand Opera
House. Through a sea of talk, the audience is carried to the fourth
act--which is _the_ act--where _Henriette_ learns that _Thibaut_ is to
be removed from her clutches to another scene of action. Then the storm
bursts, and the air is cleared with much electrical sensation.
It is not necessary to go into details. All that a woman can say who
has horridly mixed up the religious with the secular, the carnal with
the mystic, _Henriette_ says, in an ecstasy of exclamation points.
_Thibaut_ was essential to her, for she could not pray without him! He
was part of her life, both earthly and heavenly. In an exasperation of
anguish she develops a sort of insanity that makes a plausible excuse
for the ugly irreverence and the blasphemy of the playwright.
Blasphemy always seems to me the weakest sort of sensation. Any
idiot can blaspheme, and most of them do. It is the keynote of “Ces
Messieurs.” The priest is the target at which the woman hurls her ugly
shafts. Sensuality masquerading in the cloak of religion renders this
heroine as disagreeable as any I have ever seen staged. And this--with
nothing more--is M. Ancey’s case against the priests. The _Abbé_ has
accepted _Henriette’s_ money for his works of benevolence, and she had
given it not because she was actuated by religion, but because she
was hopelessly in love with the priest himself, who had involuntarily
inspired the sentiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account