Alchemy: Ancient and Modern: Being a Brief Account of the Alchemistic Doctrines, and Their Relations, to Mysticism on the One Hand, and to Recent Discoveries in Physical Science on the Other Hand; Together with Some Particulars Regarding the Lives and Teachings of the Most Noted AlchemistsRedgrove, H. Stanley (Herbert Stanley)
Religion
Alchemy: Ancient and Modern: Being a Brief Account of the Alchemistic Doctrines, and Their Relations, to Mysticism on the One Hand, and to Recent Discoveries in Physical Science on the Other Hand; Together with Some Particulars Regarding the Lives and Teachings of the Most Noted Alchemists
Redgrove, H. Stanley (Herbert Stanley)
Alchemy -- History
§ =73.= Robert Boyle (1626-1691) had defined an element as a substance
which could not be decomposed, but which could enter into combination
with other elements giving compounds capable of decomposition into these
original elements. Hence, the metals were classed among the elements,
since they had defied all attempts to decompose them. Now, it must be
noted that this definition is of a negative character, and, although it
is convenient to term “elements” all substances which have so far defied
decomposition, it is a matter of impossibility to decide what substances
are true elements with absolute certainty; and the possibility, however
faint, that gold and other metals are of a compound nature, and hence
the possibility of preparing gold from the “base” metals or other
substances, must always remain. This uncertainty regarding the elements
appears to have generally been recognised by the new school of chemists,
but this having been so, it is the more surprising that their criticism
of alchemistic art was not less severe.
The Stoichiometric Laws.
§ =74.= With the study of the relative weights in which substances
combine, certain generalisations or “natural laws” of supreme importance
were discovered. These stoichiometric laws, as they are called, are as
follows:--
1. “The Law of Constant Proportion”--_The same chemical compound always
contains the same elements, and there is a constant ratio between the
weights of the constituent elements present._
2. “The Law of Multiple Proportions”--_If two substances combine
chemically in more than one proportion, the weights of the one which
combine with a given weight of the other, stand in a simple rational
ratio to one another._
3. “The Law of Combining Weights”--_Substances combine either in the
ratio of their combining numbers, or in simple rational multiples or
submultiples of these numbers._ (The weights of different substances
which combine with a given weight of some particular substance, which is
taken as the unit, are called the combining numbers of such substances
with reference to this unit. The usual unit now chosen is 8 grammes of
Oxygen.)[90]
[90] In order that these laws may hold good, it is, of course,
necessary that the substances are weighed under precisely similar
conditions. To state these laws in a more absolute form, we can
replace the term “weight” by “mass,” or in preference, “inertia”;
for the inertias of bodies are proportional to their weights,
providing that they are weighed under precisely similar conditions.
For a discussion of the exact significance of these terms “mass” and
“inertia,” the reader is referred to the present writer’s _Matter,
Spirit and the Cosmos_ (Rider, 1910), Chapter I., “On the Doctrine
of the Indestructibility of Matter.”
As examples of these laws we may take the few following simple facts:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account