Alchemy: Ancient and Modern: Being a Brief Account of the Alchemistic Doctrines, and Their Relations, to Mysticism on the One Hand, and to Recent Discoveries in Physical Science on the Other Hand; Together with Some Particulars Regarding the Lives and Teachings of the Most Noted AlchemistsRedgrove, H. Stanley (Herbert Stanley)
Religion
Alchemy: Ancient and Modern: Being a Brief Account of the Alchemistic Doctrines, and Their Relations, to Mysticism on the One Hand, and to Recent Discoveries in Physical Science on the Other Hand; Together with Some Particulars Regarding the Lives and Teachings of the Most Noted Alchemists
Redgrove, H. Stanley (Herbert Stanley)
Alchemy -- History
§ =77.= It was observed by a chemist of the name of Prout, that, the
atomic weight of hydrogen being taken as the unit, the atomic weights
of nearly all the elements approximated to whole numbers; and in 1815 he
suggested as the reason for this regularity, that all the elements
consist solely of hydrogen. Prout’s Hypothesis received on the whole a
very favourable reception; it harmonised Dalton’s Theory with the grand
concept of the unity of matter--all matter was hydrogen in essence; and
Thomas Thomson undertook a research to demonstrate its truth. On the
other hand, however, the eminent Swedish chemist, Berzelius, who had
carried out many atomic weight determinations, criticised both Prout’s
Hypothesis and Thomson’s research (which latter, it is true, was
worthless) in most severe terms; for the hypothesis amounted to
this--that the decimals in the atomic weights obtained experimentally by
Berzelius, after so much labour, were to be regarded as so many errors.
In 1844, Marignac suggested half the hydrogen atom as the unit, for the
element chlorine, with an atomic weight of 35·5, would not fit in with
Prout’s Hypothesis as originally formulated; and later, Dumas suggested
one-quarter. With this theoretical division of the hydrogen-atom, the
hypothesis lost its simplicity and charm, and was doomed to downfall.
Recent and most accurate atomic weight determinations show clearly that
the atomic weights are not exactly whole numbers, but that,
nevertheless, the majority of them (if expressed in terms of O = 16 as
the unit) do approximate very closely to such. The Hon. R. J. Strutt has
recently calculated that the probability of this occurring, in the case
of certain of the commoner elements, by mere chance is exceedingly small
(about 1 in 1,000),[93] and several attempts to explain this remarkable
fact have been put forward. Modern scientific speculations concerning
the constitution of atoms tend towards a modified form of Prout’s
hypothesis, or to the view that the atoms of other elements are, in a
manner, polymerides of hydrogen and helium atoms. As has been pointed
out, it is possible, according to modern views, for elements of
different atomic weight to have identical chemical properties, since
these latter depend only upon the number of free electrons in the atom
and not at all upon the massive central nucleus. By a method somewhat
similar to that used for determining the mass of kathode particles (see
§ 79), but applied to positively charged particles, Sir Joseph Thomson
and Dr. F. W. Aston discovered that the element neon was a mixture of
two isotopic elements in unequal proportions, one having an atomic mass
of 20, the other (present only to a slight extent) having an atomic mass
of 22. Dr. Aston has perfected this method of analysing mixtures of
isotopes and determining their atomic masses.[94] The results are of
great interest. The atomic weight of hydrogen, 1·008, is confirmed. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account