Alcuin of York : $b Lectures delivered in the cathedral church of Bristol in 1907 and 1908Browne, G. F. (George Forrest)
Religion
Alcuin of York : $b Lectures delivered in the cathedral church of Bristol in 1907 and 1908
Browne, G. F. (George Forrest)
Alcuin, 735-804
Something should be said about the language spoken by the people of
France and Germany in the times with which we are dealing, the reference
to a rustic tongue being not infrequent.
In the Council convened by Charlemagne at Tours in the year 813, equally
representing Eastern France and Western France, Austrasia and Neustria,
Germany and the Galliae, the bishops in the Transalpine Empire were
enjoined to be diligent in preaching, and to take care that their
discourses should be rendered either into Romana Rustica or into
Theotisc or Deutsch, that all might understand. It may be of interest
to give the earliest specimens we have of these native languages.
Philologically, these examples are of the very highest importance.
[Illustration: PLATE IX
Silk stuff of the seventh or eighth century.
_To face p. 292._]
In 841, after the dreadful battle of Fontenai near Vézelay in Burgundy,
where Charles-le-Chauve and Louis-le-Germanique combined against their
brother Lothar and their nephew Pepin and defeated them, they held a
Congress at Strassburg to confirm their alliance.
Louis and Charles each made announcement in Latin of the purpose of
their agreement, and of their intention to take in public an oath each
to other. That done, Louis, as the elder, first took the oath. Being
the ruler of the German portion of the empire, he took the oath in the
language of the Franks, the Romance tongue, Rustica Romana, in order that
the adherents of Charles might hear and understand his undertaking. These
were the words of his oath, probably read by a chancellor, for the Latin
account[273] says _haec se servaturum testatus est_:—
“Pro Deo amur et pro christian poblo et nostro commun salvament, dist
di[274] in avant, in quant Deus savir et podir me dunat[275], si salvarai
eo cist meon fradre Karlo, et in aiudha et in cadhuna[276] cosa, si cum
om[277] per dreit[278] son fradra salvar dist, in o quid il mi altresi
fazet[279]; et ab Ludher nul plaid numquam prindrai, qui meon vol[280]
cist meon fradre Karle in damno sit.”
Then Charles said the same in the language of the Germans, the Teudisc or
Deutsch tongue. The Latin account uses a different phrase here, _haec
eadem verba testatus est_.
“In Godes minna ind in thes christianes folches ind unser bedhero
gehaltnissi, fon thesemo dage frammordes, so fram so mir Got geuuizci
indi mahd furgibit, so haldi thesan minan bruodher, soso man mit rehtu
sinan bruodher scal, in thiu, thaz er mig so sama duo; indi mit Ludheren
in nohheiniu thing ne gegango, the minan uuillon imo ce scadhen uuerdhen.”
The peoples then swore an oath, each in their own, not the other’s,
tongue. The Frank people swore in the Romance language:—
“Si Lodhuvigs sagrament, que son fradre Karlo iurat, conservat, et Karlus
meos sendra de suo part non los tanit, si io returnar non l’int pois: ne
io ne neuls, cui eo returnar int pois, in nulla aiudha contra Lodhuuuig
nun li iv er.”
The others then swore in the Teudisc language:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account