Alcuin of York : $b Lectures delivered in the cathedral church of Bristol in 1907 and 1908Browne, G. F. (George Forrest)
Religion
Alcuin of York : $b Lectures delivered in the cathedral church of Bristol in 1907 and 1908
Browne, G. F. (George Forrest)
Alcuin, 735-804
It is usual to reckon the year 735 as the beginning of the great School
of York, and Archbishop—or rather, as he then was, Bishop—Ecgbert as its
originator. But it seems clear that we must carry its beginnings further
back, and count as its originator a man who filled a much larger place
in the world than even Ecgbert, archbishop as he became, and brother of
the king as he was. When Wilfrith, the first Englishman to appeal to
Rome, was put into the see of York by Theodore of Canterbury in 669,
his chaplain and biographer, Stephen Eddi, tells of four principal
works which, between that year and 678, his chief accomplished. The
first was the restoration of the Cathedral Church of York, which had
fallen into decay during the time when Lindisfarne was the seat of the
Bishop of Northumbria. The second was the building of a noble church at
Ripon for the people of the kingdom of Elmete, which Edwin, the first
Christian king of Northumbria, had conquered from the Romano-Britons;
corresponding to the West Riding of Yorkshire and parts of Lancashire, a
portion of the great British kingdom of Rheged, at the court of which
the bard Taliessin had sung. The fourth was the building of a still more
noble church at Hexham, to be the ecclesiastical centre of the northern
part of Northumbria, replacing Lindisfarne in that character. And the
third in order was the establishment of a School, no doubt at York, as
that was his episcopal seat, and he himself was the chief teacher. The
world credits William of Wickham with the invention of the idea of a
public school in the modern sense of the word; but seven hundred[83]
years before him Wilfrith had grasped the idea and put it into practice
at York. This is what his chaplain tells us. The secular chiefs, the
noblemen, sent their sons to him to be so taught that when the time of
choice came they would be found fit to serve God in the ministry, if that
was their choice, or to serve the king in arms if they preferred that
career. We must certainly reckon the year 676, or thereabouts, as the
date of foundation of the school at York, Wilfrith as its founder, and
its principle that of the modern public school, which is supposed to give
an education so liberal that whatever career its alumnus prefers he will
be found fitted for it. The first scholars of the school of York entered,
some of them, the ministry, as learned clerks; others, the army, as fit
to be soldiers. It was still so when I went to that school sixty-four
years ago. The school is older than Winchester by seven hundred years,
and older than Eton by seven hundred and sixty-five.[84] Bede’s strong
appeal to Ecgbert led to the revival of the school after the natural
decay from which good institutions suffer in times of ecclesiastical
and civil disorder, and we date the continuous life of the school from
him. It was an interesting coincidence, that men saw in the year 735 the
revival of the school and the birth of its most famous pupil, assistant
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account