Neutrality -- Belgium; Peace; United States -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
I have watched with much dissatisfaction the gradual
disappearance of the military schools here in the East. There
are some prominent and useful ones in the West, but they are far
too few, and I do not believe there is any preliminary military
training of any sort in our public schools. I fear that the
military training required by law in certain agricultural and
other schools receiving federal aid is more or less of a fake;
the object seeming to be to get the appropriation and make the
least possible return.
If in any way you can bring it about that our boys shall be
taught to shoot, I believe with you that they can learn the
essentials of drill very quickly when need arises. And even so,
however, our rulers must learn the necessity of having rifles
enough and ammunition enough to meet any emergency at all likely
to occur.
It is idle for this nation to trust to arbitration and neutrality
treaties unbacked by force. It is idle to trust to the tepid good-will
of other nations. It is idle to trust to alliances. Alliances change.
Russia and Japan are now fighting side by side, although nine years ago
they were fighting against one another. Twenty years ago Russia and
Germany stood side by side. Fifteen years ago England was more hostile
to Russia, and even to France, than she was to Germany. It is perfectly
possible that after the close of this war the present allies will fall
out, or that Germany and Japan will turn up in close alliance.
It is our duty to try to work for a great world league for righteous
peace enforced by power; but no such league is yet in sight. At present
the prime duty of the American people is to abandon the inane and
mischievous principle of watchful waiting--that is, of slothful and
timid refusal either to face facts or to perform duty. Let us act
justly toward others; and let us also be prepared with stout heart and
strong hand to defend our rights against injustice from others.
In his recent report the Secretary of War, Mr. Garrison, has put the
case for preparedness in the interest of honorable peace so admirably
that what he says should be studied by all our people. It runs in part
as follows:
“This, then, leaves for consideration the imminent questions of
military policy; the considerations which, in my view, should be
taken into account in determining the same; and the suggestions
which occur to me to be pertinent in the circumstances.
It would be premature to attempt now to draw the ultimate lessons
from the war in Europe. It is an imperative duty, however, to
heed so much of what it brings home to us as is incontrovertible
and not to be changed by any event, leaving for later and
more detailed and comprehensive consideration what its later
developments and final conclusions may indicate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account