There is no perpendicular fall of water, but merely a gradual
descent, from Columbus to the Ohio; nay, there is no fall from the
very source of the Scioto to its mouth. Every one acquainted with
hydrostatics, knows that water will run briskly where the descent
is only a few inches in a mile. The writer believes that the
Scioto, from its source to the Ohio river, does not descend more
than one hundred feet, and that the present surface of Lake Erie
is about on a level with the Ohio in a freshet; that before the
channel of Niagara river was deepened, as it evidently has been, by
the attrition of that mighty stream; and before the hills adjacent
to the Ohio were worn down by the waters of the Scioto, the whole
country north of Chillicothe, where these hills commence, to Lake
Erie inclusive, was covered with water, except the very highest
hills in the counties of Greene, &c. which were then islands. What
tends to corroborate this opinion is, that on these high grounds we
find limestone and other rocks, and indications of gypsum; but no
alluvion, and none of those fragments and ruins which are produced
by water acting mechanically upon a country for a long space of
time. We might mention other parts of country where prairies and
barrens abound, and which have been formed by water. Those along
Greene river, in Kentucky, have evidently been covered by the
waters of that river. The bed of that stream has been deepened by
the constant flowing of the water along its channel; the water is
drained off, and the prairies and barrens now occupy the soil which
the water had made and formerly covered. The prairies above the
falls of Hockhocking, along that river, have evidently been formed
in the same way, and owe their origin and appearances to similar
causes. There is near Lancaster, on the last-mentioned river in the
State of Ohio, and near the great road, a gentle rise of ground in
the prairie, which has every appearance of having been an island,
and is so called by the people of the vicinity.
In fine, wherever prairies and barrens are found, there, for a
long space of time, water once stood, but was gradually drained
off. Else why alluvial soil to such a depth, in low situations,
and growing thinner as we ascend on ground more elevated? Else why
do we find rocks in more elevated tracts of country, and not in
prairies or barrens? Else why do we find no alluvion, no grass, but
a thick growth of ancient forest-trees on the higher lands? Else
why do we find beneath the alluvion of the prairies, pebbles and
shells similar to those at the bottom of lakes and ponds? Else why
do the higher grounds to this moment present the appearances of
so many islands? And all these indications where no stream now in
existence could by possibility have reached them?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account