The pits, which we made the particular object of our visit, are
situated in the county of Chesterfield, about 14 miles distant,
in a direction W. S. W. from Richmond, and 3 miles south of
James' River. The country rises gradually from Richmond to the
pits; and, from its sandy appearance, is evidently an alluvial
deposit, although its substratum is the granite mentioned by Mr.
M'Clure, as extending through this state from S. S. W. to N.
N. E. The coal is found on the western or upper surface of the
granite, coincident with it both in direction and inclination;
but whether they come immediately in contact or not, has not yet
been ascertained. The 'bed' of coal is supposed by the miners to
be coextensive with the granite, and I can discover no very good
reason for disagreeing with them in this particular; but, on the
contrary, many circumstances concur to strengthen the opinion that
it is really coextensive with the granite. The coal is now procured
from at least 25 different pits, opened at convenient distances
through an extent of from 50 to 70 miles. It every where commences
at the upper surface or termination of the body of granite. Some
suppose that it is imposed on the granite; and others, that a thin
stratum of slate is interposed between the coal and granite. It is
always found covered by the slate. The granite is inclined to the
horizon at an angle of 45°, and the coal has the same inclination.
And since the coal, as far as it has been discovered, is found to
accompany and correspond with the granite, why may we not suppose
that it continues to accompany the granite, where it has not
yet been discovered? At Heth's pits, the coal is 50 feet thick,
measured on a line perpendicular to the surfaces of the extreme
strata. At some of the pits between Heth's and James' River, it
is 30 feet thick; and at the river, not more than 25 feet. The
thickness of the coal on the north side of James' River, at the
pits in Henrico and Hanover counties, is variable, but at no place
greater than 25 feet; and to the south of Heth's, in the pits
extending to the Appomatox river, it is still less thick. These
facts would induce the supposition, that the coal was deposited
in a bed, near the centre of which Heth's pits were sunk. But, on
the other hand, the coal is distinctly stratified, and the number
of strata increases as the coal proceeds from the surface of the
earth; of course, therefore, the farther you proceed from the outer
extremity of the coal, the thicker the body of it will be found;
and from the inclination of the coal, the farther you are from
its outer extremity the deeper it must be under the surface of
the earth. Heth's pits are 100 feet deeper than any that have yet
been sunk; and all the pits, that I have seen, appear to be nearer
to the outer extremity of the coal. We may conclude, therefore,
that if the others had been sunk as far from the outer extremity,
they would have been as deep, and the coal would have been found
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account