The asclepias lanceolata is allied to the asclepias longifolia and
viridiflora by the absence of appendage or horn of the nectary. It
is distinguished from the longifolia, which is characterized by
alternate linear leaves, and umbels erect.
[Illustration: _Asclepias lanceolata._]
The asclepias lanceolata and asclepias viridiflora belong to Mr.
Elliott's genus acerates. In both, the nectary or stamineous crown
is short concave, and oppressed to the angles of the filaments.
ART. VIII. _Description of a New Genus of American Grass._ DIPLOCEA
BARBATA, by C. S. RAFINESQUE, Esq.
Diplocea. _Generic definition._ Flowers paniculated monoical or
polygamous. Exterior glumes membranaceous bivalve one to three
flowered, valves subequal emarginated mutic. Anterior glumes
bivalve unequal, the largest notched, notch aristated, the
smallest mutic entire bearded. _Additional characters._ Flowers
when single sepile with a lateral jutting peduncle, when double,
one sepile and one pedunculated, when three two are pedunculated
and alternate. The hermaphrodite and male flowers are similar: the
female are nearly clandestine, inferior. Stamens 3, styles 2. Seeds
ovate oblong.
_Observations._ This genus is intermediate between _amphicarpon_,
Raf. (_Milium amphicarpon_, _Pursh_) and _aira_, L. It differs from
this last by its polygamy, variable number of flowers, notched
valves, &c. The generic name means _double notch_. Its type is
the following species, which had been ranged with the _aira_, by
Walter, and considered doubtful by Pursh.
_Diplocea Barbata._
_Specific definition._ Stems cespitose, articulations bearded;
leaves rough glaucous, neck ciliated; panicles, few flowered,
female axillary; largest valvet rinervate, and ciliated as well as
the awl.
_Latin definition._ Caulibus cespetosis, geniculis barbatis, collo
ciliato, foliis scabris glaucis, paniculis paucifloris, femineis
axillaribus; valva majore trinerva, aristaque ciliata.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account