The extremes were 25° below, and 49° above zero. On the last day
but one of the month, the cold suddenly relaxed; and on the 1st
and 2d of March, a heavy and warm rain succeeded. This produced
an uncommon rise in Deerfield river, and on the 3d of March, it
had overflowed the ground where the above described phenomenon
occurred, and did not recede from it for 24 hours. Its greatest
depth there, was five feet. The snow was nearly one foot deep
when the flood happened, and being a nonconductor of heat, the
temperature of the surface of the ground was not probably much
changed from its state in February, until the water came in contact
with it. It may not be amiss to give the state of the thermometer
on the last of February and beginning of March.
7_h._ A. M. 1½_h._ P. M. 10_h._ P. M. Wind, weather, &c.
Feb. 27th, 15° below 0. 28° above 0. 32° above 0. South, clear.
28th, 31 above 45 ----- 31 ----- do. do.
March 1st, 29 ----- 46 ----- 37 ----- N. E. rain.
2d, 46 ----- 49 ----- 37 ----- do. do.
3d, 30 ----- 35 ----- 29 ----- do. rain & clear.
On the third of March, about sunset, some lads were sailing near
the spot where the disruption appears, and saw the water in
considerable agitation, with much bubbling, and at short intervals
it was thrown up in several places to the height of 3 or 4 feet.
They saw no rupture in the earth, although they came within two
or three rods of the spot, and state the water to have been two
feet deep. About one o'clock on the morning of March 4th, Mr. Seth
Sheldon and family, living one mile south from this spot, and being
awake, were alarmed by a loud report from the north, by which their
house and furniture were much shaken. They compared the sound,
though louder by far than they had ever heard from this cause, to
that of a cracking in the earth by frost in severe weather. Some
others living rather nearer the spot, were awakened by the same
report. That the rupture in the earth was made at that time is
probable, though not certain.
It may be proper to state, that during the flood, no ice, except
a few loose masses, was carried over, or near the spot where the
disruption appears. This, therefore, could not have produced it.
[Illustration: Disruption of the Ground by Frost.
_N. & S. S. Jocelyn Sc. N.H._]
Fig. 1. is a transverse section, taken with a theodolite, from
Deerfield river 28 rods south, crossing the longer axis of the
disruption at right angles. The scale is 4 rods to an inch,
although in laying off the heights and levels, the exact proportion
was a little varied, to render the irregularities of surface more
distinct. The letters of reference correspond to those on fig. 2,
and need no explanation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account