Both sides of this hill are sandstone and puddingstone, frequently
alternating: though these are most extensive on the west side, and
as we rise the puddingstone predominates. The strata dip to the
east about 10 degrees. Near the centre of this range is a ridge of
greenstone, with a mural face on the west, and amorphous masses
lying at the base, half way up to its summit. This ridge does
not rise so high as the puddingstone on the west of it, as may be
seen in the view of strata with the map. It commences on the west
bank of Connecticut river, about a mile north of the hill C, and
increases in elevation nearly to the spot where it disappears at
the fall of the river in Gill. This rock does not appear to rest on
sandstone, but to descend through it, where there is an opportunity
for observation. Deerfield river has worn a passage through the
sandstone and greenstone 150 feet deep, and the greenstone passes
under its bed, and the sandstone, at a few rods distant lies on
each side of the greenstone. A similar fact has been noticed at
the fall in Connecticut river, in Gill. Yet I have coloured this
greenstone secondary on the map; for it is certain that Mount Tom
rests on sandstone, and it is stated by Professor Silliman, that
the same rock does in Connecticut. Could we penetrate deeper below
the surface, it is probable the same would be found to be the case
with this greenstone.
As stated above, this rock disappears near the cataract in Gill,
and it is succeeded by puddingstone. But four miles farther north,
it again emerges in Bernardstone, though it rises but little above
the surface. Here its character is changed. The hornblende is
more crystalline, and the rock becomes decidedly primitive, as
you approach a mountain of argillite and mica slate, into which
it passes, and no greenstone has been observed north of this. It
terminates not far from the line of Vermont. The red sandstone and
conglomerate also terminate on the opposite side of the river in
Northfield.
The greenstone in the above described range, is of a finer texture
than the same rock in Connecticut; and the feldspar, in some
specimens, is scarcely discernible with a microscope. Indeed, in
many instances, the eye would decide the rock to be basalt. Much
of it is fissile, the laminæ varying from half an inch to a foot
in thickness. This is most perceptible among the loose masses;
but it exists also in that in place. Whether this circumstance be
accidental, I will not attempt to decide.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account