American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
He was eager to learn and susceptible to impression--so much so that
he was said to have followed at different times Leibl, Stevens, Rico,
Fortuny, Whistler; but the things which Chase followed were minor
matters of handling or arrangement and did not affect his personal
point of view. They were superficial fancies and were soon merged,
fused, or abandoned. Some of the old masters, Velasquez, Titian,
Hals, Rembrandt, had a stronger influence upon him, but these men he
never tried to follow. It was their high artistic plane that gave him
inspiration. Standing before Titian’s “Young Englishman” in the Pitti,
his admiration for its superb poise and lofty dignity was unbounded. It
was faultless and flawless intellectually and technically. The left eye
was out of drawing, but Titian intended it so. It gave the face more
character. He never even wanted to suspect that the restorer in the
cleaning-room was perhaps responsible for the bad drawing of the eye.
Titian was above criticism.
Chase was never mean in his enthusiasms. He loved whole-heartedly.
Before Velasquez at Madrid everything was just as it should be. He
was the greatest of them all--the master craftsman of the craft; in
the Louvre he protested that no one had ever equalled or approached
such still-life painting as that of Chardin; at Haarlem he was just as
unstinted in praise of Frans Hals. And he was right about them all.
He was a very good judge of pictures and picked out no questionable
masters for admiration. Where he found a great masterpiece in a
gallery, there he unslung his kit, sat down, and made a copy. He at
different times produced very remarkable copies of Velasquez, Hals,
Rembrandt, Rubens, Van Dyck, Ribera, Watteau. Whatever past art had to
teach, Chase was eager to learn. He kept a receptive mind and a live
interest in all phases of painting, and had more inherent knowledge
of craftsmanship than any of his contemporaries. The literary history
of art he knew nothing about, and probably could not have told within
a hundred years when Velasquez or Hals was born. That side of art has
small interest for artists, and for Chase it was more or less of a
blank space.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account