American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, SargentVan Dyke, John C.
History
American painting and its tradition : $b as represented by Inness, Wyant, Martin, Homer, La Farge, Whistler, Chase, Alexander, Sargent
Van Dyke, John C.
Painters -- United States; Painting -- United States
A painter who has been looking at human heads for many years sees
more than the man who casually looks up to recognize an acquaintance
on the street. I do not mean that he sees more “character”--that is
more scholarship or conceit or pride of purse or firmness of will
or shrewdness of thought; but merely that he sees the physical
conformation more completely than we do. Well, every one sooner or
later moulds his own face. It becomes marked or set or shaped in
response to continued methods of thinking and acting. When that face
comes under the portrait-painter’s eye he does not see the scholar,
the banker, the senator, the captain of industry; but he does see,
perhaps, certain depressions of the cheek or lines about the eyes
or mouth or contractions of the lips or protrusions of the brow or
jaw that appeal to him strongly because they are cast in shadow or
thrown up sharply in relief of light. These surface features he paints
perhaps with more emphasis than they possess in the original because
they appeal to him emphatically, and presently the peculiar look that
indicates the character of the man appears. What the look may indicate,
or what kind or phase of character may be read in or out of the look,
the portrait-painter does not usually know or care. It is not his
business to know. He paints what he sees and has as little discernment
of a character as of a mind. He gives, perhaps without knowing their
meaning, certain protrusions and recessions of the surface before him
and lets the result tell what tale it may.
[Illustration: “Mrs. Pulitzer,” by John S. Sargent.]
In the production of the portrait accurate observation is more than
half the battle. If a painter sees and knows his subject thoroughly,
he will have little trouble in telling what he sees and knows; and
to say of Sargent that he observes rightly and records truly is to
state the case in a sentence. Nothing in the physical presence escapes
him. The slight inclination of a head, the shyness of a glance, the
mobility of a mouth, the uneasiness of a hand, the nervous strain of a
gesture are all turned to account in the ultimate result. Every tone
of color in itself and in its relation to the other tones, every light
in its relation to its shadow and to the other lights, every melting
contour in contrast with every accented contour, and every texture in
relation to every other texture--all are caught within the angle of the
painter’s focus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account