American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
A new question was soon evolved by the struggle, for some who entered
from the South took their slaves with them. The Free State men now
contended that slavery was a local institution and confined to the
States where it existed, and that if an emigrant passed into the
territory with his slaves these became free. The Southern view was, that
slaves were recognized as property by the National Constitution; that
therefore their masters had a right to take them there and hold them
under constitutional guarantees, the same as any other property; that to
assert anything else would be to deny the equality of the States within
their common territory, and degrade them from the rank of equals to that
of inferiors. This last proposition had such force that it would
doubtless have received more general recognition if the North had not
felt that the early compact dedicating the territories north of 36° 30′
to freedom, had been violated. In answer to this proposition they
therefore proclaimed in their platforms and speeches, and there was no
other logical answer, “that freedom was National, and slavery
Sectional.”
We cannot enter upon a full description of the scenes in Kansas, but
bloodshed and rapine soon followed the attempts of the opposing parties
to get control of its government. What were called the “Border Ruffians”
by the Free State men, because of active and warlike organization in
Missouri and upon its borders, in the earlier parts of the struggle,
seemed to have the advantage. They were supported by friends near at
hand at all times, and warlike raids were frequent. The Free State men
had to depend mainly upon New England for supplies in arms and means,
but organizations were in turn rapidly completed to meet their calls,
and the struggle soon became in the highest degree critical.
The pro-slavery party sustained the Territorial government appointed by
the administration; the anti-slavery party repudiated it, because of its
presumed committal to slavery. The election for members of the
Territorial legislature had been attended with much violence and fraud,
and it was claimed that these things properly annulled any action taken
by that body. A distinct and separate convention was called at Topeka to
frame a State constitution, and the Free State men likewise elected
their own Governor and Legislature to take the place of those appointed
by Buchanan, and when the necessary preliminaries were completed, they
applied for admission into the Union. After a long and bitter struggle
Congress decided the question by refusing to admit Kansas under the
Topeka Constitution, and by recognizing the authority of the territorial
government. These proceedings took place during the session of 1856–7,
which terminated immediately before the inauguration of President
Buchanan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account