American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
_Question 1._—I desire to know whether Lincoln to-day stands, as he did
in 1854, in favor of the unconditional repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law?
_Answer._—I do not now, nor ever did, stand in favor of the
unconditional repeal of the Fugitive Slave Law.
_Q. 2._—I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to-day, as he
did in 1854, against the admission of any more slave States into the
Union, even if the people want them?
_A._—I do not now, nor ever did, stand pledged against the admission of
any more slave States into the Union.
_Q. 3_—I want to know, whether he stands pledged against the admission
of a new State into the Union, with such a Constitution as the people of
the State may see fit to make?
_A._—I do not stand pledged against the admission of a new State into
the Union, with such a Constitution as the people of the State may see
fit to make.
_Q. 4._—I want to know whether he stands to-day pledged to the abolition
of slavery in the District of Columbia?
_A._—I do not stand to-day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the
District of Columbia.
_Q. 5._—I desire him to answer whether he stands pledged to the
prohibition of the slave trade between the different States?
_A._—I do not stand pledged to prohibition of the slave trade between
the different States.
_Q. 6._—I desire to know whether he stands pledged to prohibit slavery
in all the Territories of the United States, North as well as South of
the Missouri Compromise line?
_A._—I am impliedly, if not expressly, pledged to a belief in the RIGHT
and DUTY of Congress to prohibit slavery in all of the United States’
Territories.
_Q. 7._—I desire him to answer, whether he is opposed to the acquisition
of any new territory, unless slavery is first prohibited therein?
_A._—I am not generally opposed to honest acquisition of territory; and
in any given case, I would or would not oppose such acquisition,
according as I might think such acquisition would or would not aggravate
the slavery question among ourselves.
“Now, my friends, it will be perceived upon an examination of these
questions and answers, that so far, I have only answered that I was not
_pledged_ to this, that, or the other.
The judge has not framed his interrogatories to ask me anything more
than this and I have answered in strict accordance with the
interrogatories, and have answered truly, that I am not _pledged_ at all
upon any of the points to which I have answered. But I am not disposed
to hang upon the exact form of his interrogatories. I am rather disposed
to take up, at least some of these questions, and state what I really
think upon them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account