American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
Before the balloting commenced Mr. Howard succeeded, in the face of
strong opposition, with the aid of the thirty-five votes from New York,
in obtaining a vote of the Convention in re-affirmance of the two-thirds
rule. On his motion they resolved, by 141, to 112 votes, “that the
President of the Convention be and he is hereby directed not to declare
any person nominated for the office of President or Vice-President,
unless he shall have received a number of votes equal to two-thirds of
the votes of all the electoral colleges.” It was well known at the time
that this resolution rendered the regular nomination of Mr. Douglas
impossible.
The balloting then commenced (Tuesday evening, May 1st), on the eighth
day of the session. Necessary to a nomination, under the two-thirds
rule, 202 votes. On the first ballot Mr. Douglas received 145½ votes;
Mr. Hunter, of Virginia, 42; Mr. Guthrie, of Kentucky, 35½; Mr. Johnson,
of Tennessee, 12; Mr. Dickinson, of New York, 7; Mr. Lane, of Oregon, 6;
Mr. Toucey, of Connecticut, 2½; Mr. Davis, of Mississippi, 1½; and Mr.
Pearce, of Maryland, 1 vote.
The voting continued until May 3d, during which there were fifty-four
additional ballotings. Mr. Douglas never rose to more than 152½, and
ended in 151½ votes, 202 votes being necessary to a nomination.
Until 1824 nominations had been made by Congressional caucus. In these
none participated except Senators and Democratic States, and
Representatives from Democratic Congressional districts. The simple
majority rule governed in these caucuses, because it was morally certain
that, composed as they were, no candidate could be selected against the
will of the Democratic States on whom his election depended. But when a
change was made to National Conventions, it was at once perceived that
if a mere majority could nominate, then the delegates from
Anti-Democratic States might be mainly instrumental in nominating a
candidate for whom they could not give a single electoral vote. Whilst
it would have been harsh and inexpedient to exclude these States from
the Convention altogether, it would have been unjust to confer on them a
controlling power over the nomination. To compromise this difficulty,
the two-thirds rule was adopted. Under its operation it would be almost
impossible that a candidate could be selected, without the votes of a
simple majority of delegates from the Democratic States. This was the
argument of its friends.
It had now become manifest that it was impossible to make a nomination
at Charleston. The friends of Mr. Douglas adhered to him and would vote
for him and him alone, whilst his opponents, apprehending the effect of
his principles should he be elected President, were equally determined
to vote against his nomination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account