American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
A “Constitutional Union,” really an American Convention, had met at
Baltimore on the 9th of May. Twenty States were represented, and John
Bell, of Tennessee, and Edward Everett, of Massachusetts, were named for
the Presidency and Vice-Presidency. Their friends, though known to be
less in number than either those of Douglas, Lincoln or Breckinridge,
yet made a vigorous canvass in the hope that the election would be
thrown into the House, and that there a compromise in the vote by States
would naturally turn toward their candidates. The result of the great
contest is elsewhere given in our Tabulated History of Politics.
THE PRINCIPLES INVOLVED.
Lincoln received large majorities in nearly all of the free States, his
popular vote being 1,866,452; electoral vote, 180. Douglas was next in
the popular estimate, receiving 1,375,157 votes, with but 12 electors.
Breckinridge had 847,953 votes, with 76 electors; Bell, with 570,631
votes, had 39 electors.
The principles involved in the controversy are given at length in the
Book of Platforms, and were briefly these: The Republican party asserted
that slavery should not be extended to the territories; that it could
exist only by virtue of local and positive law; that freedom was
national; that slavery was morally wrong, and the nation should at least
anticipate its gradual extinction. The Douglas wing of the Democratic
party adhered to the doctrine of popular sovereignty, and claimed that
in its exercise in the territories they were indifferent whether slavery
was voted up or down. The Breckinridge wing of the Democratic party
asserted both the moral and legal right to hold slaves, and to carry
them to the territories, and that no power save the national
constitution could prohibit or interfere with it outside of State lines.
The Americans supporting Bell, adhered to their peculiar doctrines
touching emigration and naturalization, but had abandoned, in most of
the States, the secrecy and oaths of the Know-Nothing order. They were
evasive and non-committal on the slavery question.
Preparing for Secession.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account