American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
History
American politics (non-partisan) from the beginning to date : $b embodying a history of all the political parties, with their views and records on all important questions. Great speeches on all great issues, and tabulated history and chronological events.
Cooper, Thomas V. (Thomas Valentine)
Political parties -- United States; United States -- Politics and government
The land revenue distribution bill of this session had its origin in the
fact that the States and corporations owed about two hundred millions to
creditors in Europe. These debts were in stocks, much depreciated by the
failure in many instances to pay the accruing interest—in some instances
failure to provide for the principal. These creditors, becoming uneasy,
wished the federal government to assume their debts. The suggestion was
made as early as 1838, renewed in 1839, and in 1840 became a regular
question mixed up with the Presidential election of that year, and
openly engaging the active exertions of foreigners. Direct assumption
was not urged; indirect by giving the public land revenue to the States
was the mode pursued, and the one recommended in the message of
President Tyler. Mr. Calhoun spoke against the measure with more than
usual force and clearness, claiming that it was unconstitutional and
without warrant. Mr. Benton on the same side called it a squandering of
the public patrimony, and pointed out its inexpediency in the depleted
state of the treasury, apart from its other objectionable features. It
passed by a party vote.
This session is remarkable for the institution of the hour rule in the
House of Representatives—a very great limitation upon the freedom of
debate. It was a Whig measure, adopted to prevent delay in the enactment
of pending bills. It was a rigorous limitation, frequently acting as a
bar to profitable debate and checking members in speeches which really
impart information valuable to the House and the country. No doubt the
license of debate has been frequently abused in Congress, as in all
other deliberative assemblies, but the incessant use of the previous
question, which cuts off all debate, added to the hour rule which limits
a speech to sixty minutes (constantly reduced by interruptions)
frequently results in the transaction of business in ignorance of what
they are about by those who are doing it.
The rule worked so well in the House, for the purpose for which it was
devised—made the majority absolute master of the body—that Mr. Clay
undertook to have the same rule adopted in the Senate; but the
determined opposition to it, both by his political opponents and
friends, led to the abandonment of the attempt in that chamber.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account