Americanization; Civics; Immigrants -- United States; Naturalization -- United States; Noncitizens -- United States
In this table there are 14 countries listed whose per cent of denials
exceeds that for all countries. Of these only four supply the “new”
immigration. And of the seven showing a lower than 11.5 per cent
denials, five constitute the “new” immigration. This would point
to greater success on the part of the new races in attaining their
naturalization papers. The qualifying fact here, as elsewhere, is
that more than twice as many petitioners belong to the “new” races as
to the “old.”
The two causes of denial showing the largest per cents for the
country as a whole and for most countries are “want of prosecution”
and the invalidity of their “old-law” declaration. That so large a
proportion of immigrants have taken the trouble to take almost the
last steps toward citizenship and then fail by default is symptomatic
of waste somewhere along the line. This condition seems to prevail
among both the “old” and “new” peoples.
AS REGARDS “IMMORAL CHARACTER”
For some of the less mechanical causes of denial, let us segregate
and arrange the countries in order of percentages. The following
table shows denials for “immoral character.”
TABLE XIX
PER CENT OF DENIALS DUE TO “IMMORAL CHARACTER,” BY RACE
=================================
Country of Birth Denials
Per Cent
---------------------------------
Total cases 1.9
Turkey in Europe 7.6
Denmark 6.9
Sweden 5.0
Canada 4.6
Rumania 3.7
Hungary 3.2
England 2.5
Germany 2.4
Russia 1.7
Italy 1.7
Austria 1.4
Ireland 0.6
=================================
The average percentage of denials for the whole United States for the
period 1908-18 on the ground of “immoral character” was 4.0 per cent.
With the exception of Turkey in Europe, not one of the “newer” races
came up to this average in the year 1913-14, so far as may be judged
by this analysis of the court records of more than one in five of
the petitions passed upon in that year. Austria, Hungary, Italy,
Rumania, all showed a record materially better, and the figures
generally show that cause to be negligible, anyway.
THE SHOWING AS TO “IGNORANCE”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account