1916. 1917. 1920. 1922. lb. oz. lb. oz. lb. oz. lb. oz. 4 7 4 10 7 8 5 2 4 1 4 1 4 10 5 1 3 13 4 0 4 8 4 8 3 10 3 14 4 7 4 4 3 9 3 14 4 4 3 4 3 6 3 10 3 10 3 4 3 1 3 9 3 10 3 4 3 0 3 8 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 8 2 9 2 12 3 0 3 5 2 8 2 8 2 12 3 1 1 12 2 4 2 12 3 ½ 1 10 2 2 2 9 2 13 1 10 2 1 2 8 2 8 1 10 2 0 2 8 2 8 1 8 2 0 2 4 2 4 1 8 2 0 2 3 2 4 1 8 3 of 1 12 2 2 2 0 1 4 7 of 1 8 2 0 .. 1 4 5 of 1 4 2 0 .. 1 2 1 0 The fish caught have been remarkable not only for their weight but also for their extraordinary beauty and condition. Those of us who have seen them have seen many trout in our time, but have never seen trout to compare with those caught during the first four or five years after we began fishing the loch. Several of these, which we measured, were as much in girth as in length from the gills to the point of the tail where the flesh ends. They had small heads and were most beautifully coloured. Their flesh was in colour a deep red--no doubt due to the pigment in the fresh-water shrimps which, as I have said, abound in the loch. It is an interesting fact that, although the loch was very little fished by ladies, they secured the two largest fish, one of 7½ lb., which took over three-quarters of an hour to land and gave splendid sport, the other 6 lb. The former was a most extraordinary fish. It was 22 inches in length, 16 inches in length from the gills to the point where the flesh ends at the tail, and 16 inches in girth. There is, however, no doubt that, with the exception of this particular fish, the fish caught during the last four or five years, whilst in excellent condition and comparing very favourably with the ordinary large brown trout caught elsewhere, have not been so extraordinary in their girth as in the first few years after the loch was stocked.