XII. There is no reason, therefore, in this case, for ascribing the contractions either to the arc or to the armatures, which, as they consist of mercury alone, cannot produce the two kinds of electricity necessary for exciting contractions. But even if we should allow, with those who form the most absurd suppositions, that mercury alone possesses both kinds of electricity, one contraction only could be expected, and not several in succession. In a word, there is no reason to apprehend that any external electricity is obtained either from the glass vessel which receives the mercury, or from the surrounding atmosphere, which is separated from the spinal marrow by three strata of non-conducting bodies; namely, air, glass, and oil. The simplicity of this process may not be fully apparent to the reader; but I can with truth assert, that simplicity was an object which I had always in view. Having prepared a frog, I laid it to float in mercury immersed in oil, and then endeavoured to excite contractions by the application of an insulated arc. Owing to some inaccuracy in the experiment, however, it did not succeed; and my attachment to simplicity, while endeavouring to discover the least complex method of exciting contractions, was the cause of my not obtaining the desired result. This want of success was perhaps owing to the mercury not being in proper contact with the nerves, in consequence of the oil adhering to them. That I might exclude all suspicion of atmospheric air having any share in the phænomenon, I was obliged to adopt that method of performing the experiment which I have already described.