An Account of the Late Improvements in Galvanism: With a Series of Curious and Interesting Experiments Performed Before the Commissioners of the French National Institute, and Repeated Lately in the Anatomical Theatres of LondonAldini, Giovanni
Science
An Account of the Late Improvements in Galvanism: With a Series of Curious and Interesting Experiments Performed Before the Commissioners of the French National Institute, and Repeated Lately in the Anatomical Theatres of London
Aldini, Giovanni
Electricity -- Early works to 1850
I publish my experiments respecting muscular contractions
produced by one metal with the greater confidence, as they were
repeated different ways by the celebrated Humboldt, who has
adopted my opinion. In his work on Galvanism, under the head
which he entitles “Answer to the Objections made by Volta to the
Experiments of Aldini,” he says, “J. Aldini of Bologna invented a
very ingenious apparatus, by means of which he was enabled to
refute the supposition of Professor Volta. For this purpose he
had recourse to mercury: every thing relating to his experiments
is very well represented in the plate which accompanies his
memoir. Volta, in reply to these experiments, observes, that they
can impose only on those who have not thoroughly examined them.
He denies the facts related by Aldini, and persists in his
opinion that the phænomena of Galvanism may all be referred to
the laws of heterogeneity. In regard to the experiments made with
mercury, he says that there is a great difference between the
surface of this metal and the interior of its mass; because the
surface becomes oxidated by the contact of the atmospheric air;
that consequently, in the experiment of Aldini, the conducting
arc is not really but apparently homogeneous, the organs being
immersed to different depths in the metal: besides, that the
mercury in these experiments produces a shock; and that, as this
shock is not the same at both extremities of the arc, the result
is an unequal development of electricity. Volta, therefore,
opposes to the phænomena described by Aldini nothing but
hypothesis. We might reply in the same manner; but as it is much
better in philosophical disputes to have recourse to experiments,
I undertook some researches for the purpose of removing all doubt
in regard to this subject.
“I purified mercury by all the known means employed for that
purpose. I strained it several times through a piece of
chamois leather; I washed it with water and soap, with
vinegar and with alcohol. It appeared to me that it
contained neither lead nor tin; and that it was free from
oily particles and dust: it was perfectly fluid, and divided
itself into small, very round globules, which did not adhere
to each other, and which left behind them no traces. Its
surface was as brilliant as that of glass, without any
pellicle or spot; and a small quantity of it being stirred
in a mortar with water, did not communicate to it any
sensible colour. It dissolved in nitric acid without
sensible effervescence, and without giving any precipitate.
A large quantity of mercury thus purified was poured into
three porcelain vessels; and as I was aware that, if I
performed several experiments with the same quantity of
mercury, it might be objected, that the metal had contracted
some impurity by the mere contact of the animal substances,
I made only one experiment with the mercury in each of the
vessels.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account