An American Patrician, or The Story of Aaron Burr: IllustratedLewis, Alfred Henry
History
An American Patrician, or The Story of Aaron Burr: Illustrated
Lewis, Alfred Henry
Burr, Aaron, 1756-1836
It is against this self-sufficient attitude of the rusty Schuyler
touching locked senate doors that Aaron wages war. He urges that, in a
republic, but two keys go with government; one is to the treasury, the
other to the jail. He argues that not even a senate will lock a door
unless it be either ashamed or afraid of what it is about.
“Of what is our Senate afraid?” he asks.
“Of what is it ashamed? I cannot answer these questions; the people
cannot answer them. I recommend that those who are interested ask
General Schuyler.”
The public puts the questions to the rusty Schuyler. Not receiving an
answer, the public carries the questions to the legislature, where the
Clinton and Livingston influences come sharply to the popular support.
“Shall the Senate lock its door?”
The Clintons say No; the Livingstons say No; the people say No. Under
such overbearing circumstances, the legislature feels driven to say No;
and, as a best method of saying it, elects to the Senate Aaron, who is
a “door-opener,” over the rusty Schuyler, who is a “door-closer,” by a
majority of thirteen. It is no longer “Aaron Burr,” no longer “Colonel
Burr,” it is “Senator Burr.” The news heaps the full weight of ten years
on the rusty Schuyler. As for son-in-law Hamilton, the blasting word of
it withers and makes sick his heart.
CHAPTER XI--THE STATESMAN FROM NEW YORK
THE shop of government has been moved to Philadelphia. In the brief
space between the overthrow of the rusty Schuyler by Aaron, and
the latter taking his seat, the great ones talk of nothing but that
overthrow. Washington vaguely and Jefferson clearly read in the victory
of Aaron the beginning of a new order. It is extravagantly an hour of
classes and masses; and the most dull does not fail to make out in the
Senate unseating of the rusty but aristocratic Schuyler a triumphant
clutch at power by the masses.
Something of the sort crops up in conversation about the President’s
dinner table. The occasion is informal; save for Vice-President Adams,
those present are of the Cabinet. Washington himself brings up the
subject.
“It is the strangest news!” says he--“this word of the Senate success of
Colonel Burr.”
Then, appealing to Hamilton: “Of what could your folk of New York have
been thinking? General Schuyler is a gentleman of fortune, the head of
one of the oldest families! This Colonel Burr is a young man of small
fortune, and no family at all.”
“Sir,” breaks in Adams with pompous impetuosity, “you go wide. Colonel
Burr is of the best blood of New England. His grandsire was Jonathan
Edwards; on his father’s side the strain is as high. You would look
long, sir, before you discovered one who has a better pedigree.”
“Whatever may be the gentleman’s pedigree,” retorts Hamilton
splenetically, “you will at least confess it to be only a New England
pedigree.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account