An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supplyBeadnell, H. J. L. (Hugh John Llewellyn)
History
An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supply
In selecting sites for their forts, monasteries, and other
buildings, the Romans were naturally drawn to eminences commanding
views of the surrounding country. It was, of course, desirable,
and in the case of forts absolutely necessary, to have a supply
of water within the building, and it was the custom, therefore,
to sink a deep bore within the precincts, generally in the centre
of the courtyard. In many cases, however, owing to the elevation,
the water would not rise to the surface, the supplies being drawn
up by hand. In order to make the water of such a well available for
irrigating the lands situated outside the fort, one or more gently
inclined tunnels were excavated so as to tap the bore below the
fort; the well was thus made to serve a double purpose. Excellent
examples of such conduits are to be seen at Dêr el Ghennîma. Here
the well is in the middle of the courtyard, and three underground
tunnels converge on it from the low-lying and anciently cultivated
lands to the north and north-west. Along those portions where the
bottom of the channel was in soft ground, and not more than a metre
or two below the surface, the conduit was made in the form of an
open trench, the sides being carefully built in with stone.
[Illustration: QASR LEBEKHA AND THE NORTHERN ESCARPMENT OF THE
OASIS.]
When the excavation of the trenches was completed, the open portions
were covered over with large flat slabs of rock, so that the channels
were not only well protected from blowing sand, but quite invisible
on the surface. The underground conduits at Dêr el Ghennîma were
indeed quite unsuspected before they were accidentally discovered
a year or two ago. The tapping of the bore within the fort had,
of course, the effect of still further lowering the water-level
as regards the courtyard; it is quite likely, therefore, that
the inhabitants had a means of blocking the underground channel
when they desired the water to rise to its maximum level in the
well. But in any case the few extra metres of distance from the
surface to the water could not have been a matter of importance,
as the comparatively small supplies needed for domestic purposes
within the fort were doubtless raised by means of a bucket and rope
attached to a windlass.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account