An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supplyBeadnell, H. J. L. (Hugh John Llewellyn)
History
An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supply
“To Amenebis, the supreme god of Tchonemyris, and to the associated
gods of the temple, for the eternal preservation of Antoninus
Cæsar our Lord, and his whole house. The cell of the temple and
the vestibule were repaired and renewed under Avidius Heliodorus,
governor of Egypt; Septimius Macro being commander-in-chief,
Plinius Capito being general of the forces, in the third year of
the Emperor Cæsar Titus Ælius Adrianus Antoninus Augustus, the
Pious. Mesore the eighteenth.”
The Emperor Antoninus Pius reigned from A.D. 138 to A.D. 161, but
antiquities unearthed from the ruins show that the town dates from
the time of the Ptolemies and flourished into the Byzantine period.
In addition to the above the dilapidated ruins of what were
doubtless once imposing buildings exist at various points within
the depression. One worthy of attention will be noted at Ain Amûr
by travellers to Dakhla along the upper road. The exact age of the
building is uncertain, though Wilkinson discovered thereon a portion
of the name of one of the Cæsars. The small stone temple stood,
like so many others in the oasis, in a courtyard enclosed by thick
walls of unburnt brick, the fragmentary remains of which are visible
in the illustration. The names of the principal deities inscribed
on the temple walls are Kneph, Ammon, and Mut. Both Edmonstone
and Wilkinson came to the conclusion that the temple is of greater
antiquity than the majority of the monuments of the oasis; but I
am inclined to believe, with Hoskins and Rohlfs, that its somewhat
crude design is explicable on other grounds than that of age.
Perhaps the most remarkable and imposing buildings in the oasis
are the great Roman fortresses, among which may be mentioned Um
el Dabâdib, Qasr Lebekha, and Dêr el Ghennîma. Possibly some
of these were fortified monasteries, though until the ruins, as
well as those of the extensive towns and cemeteries which existed
in the neighbourhood, have been subjected to critical examination,
their exact nature must remain in doubt. The so-called Dêr, near
the foot of Jebel Ghennîma, was certainly a fort guarding one of
the chief passes up the escarpment of the oasis. It is built of
immensely thick walls, strengthened intermediately and at the four
corners by enormous buttresses. The walls taper slightly upwards,
and at the top are double, concealing a passage which ran round the
entire building. In the centre of the court was a deep bore from
which the inmates obtained their water, the surplus supply flowing
through an underground conduit to the cultivated lands outside.
Qasr Lebekha, situated in a lonely part of the depression under
the northern escarpment, 12 kilometres north-west of Meheriq,
has many points in common with the fortress just described. It is,
however, much smaller, and its interior is completely filled with
domed chambers, now falling into shapeless fragments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account