An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supplyBeadnell, H. J. L. (Hugh John Llewellyn)
History
An Egyptian oasis : $b An account of the oasis of Kharga in the Libyan desert, with special reference to its history, physical geography, and water-supply
We have already described the intermittent character of the flow
in the case of some of the larger wells in the southern part of the
oasis. The circumstance is apparently due to the temporary blocking
of the bore-hole by sediment, and the consequent increase of water
and gas pressure below, which at intervals forces the sediment from
the channels and restores the normal flow. Something of the same
nature was also noticed in Bore No. 42, in the course of experiments
carried out to determine the height to which the water would rise
in an open pipe fixed to the end of the casing. At intervals a
distinct gurgling and bubbling took place in the pipe, the water at
the same time rising to as much as 8 centimetres above its normal
level, with distinct oscillations of a pressure-gauge attached to
the well. The ebb and flow did not, however, take place at regular
intervals, but at periods varying from four to nine minutes. I think
a sufficient explanation of these phenomena is the probable variation
in the amount of gas finding its way into the bore; and certainly,
after several years’ observation of the flows of a large number
of bores, I cannot admit that there is the slightest evidence in
favour of the view that the flows of the wells have a periodicity
dependent on the rise and fall of the Nile.
One frequently hears it stated that the oases were far more thickly
populated and better watered in olden times than at the present
day. This belief is based on the existence in many parts of the
depression of extensive remains of temples, forts, and villages,
on the widespread traces of formerly cultivated lands, and on the
abundance of sanded-up wells. It must not, however, be forgotten
that the remains in question belong to successive generations,
and that there is as yet no evidence to enable us to determine how
much of the land, or how many of the wells, were in use at one and
the same time. The evidence is, however, sufficiently pronounced to
justify the conclusion that under the Romans the oasis of Kharga
was far more flourishing than in modern times, a large part of
the population being engaged, not in agriculture, but in mining,
boring, and in the excavation of subterranean aqueducts.
[Illustration: LANDS UNDER RECLAMATION AT BORE NO. 39.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account