An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of SevilleBrehaut, Ernest
History
An encyclopedist of the dark ages: Isidore of Seville
Brehaut, Ernest
Isidore, of Seville, Saint, -636; Thesis (Ph. D.)
I. Definition of dialectic (chs. 22, 23).
1. Distinction between dialectic and rhetoric.
II. Definition of philosophy (ch. 24).
III. The Isagoges[2] of Porphyry (ch. 25).
1. The five predicables: genus, species, differentia, proprium,
accidens.
IV. The Categories of Aristotle (ch. 26).
V. Aristotle’s _De perihermeniis_[231] (ch. 27).
1. Thought as expressed in language.
VI. The syllogisms (ch. 28).
1. Categorical syllogisms.
2. Hypothetical syllogisms.
VII. Definition (ch. 29).
The fifteen kinds of definition.
VIII. Arguments (_topica_) (ch. 30).
The twenty-two _loci_ of arguments.
IX. Opposites (ch. 31).
[231] Isidore’s ignorance of Greek has been inferred from his use
of the forms, _isagogae_ and _perihermeniae_. See p. 36.
EXTRACTS
Book II, Chapter 22. On dialectic.
1. Dialectic is the discipline elaborated with a view of ascertaining
the causes of things. In itself it is the sub-division of philosophy
that is called logical, _i.e._, rational, capable of defining,
enquiring and expressing precisely. For it teaches in the several
kinds of questions how the true and false are separated by discussion.
2. The first philosophers used dialectic in their discourses, but
they did not reduce it to the practical form of an art. After them
Aristotle systematized the subject-matter of this branch of learning,
and called it dialectic, because there is discussion of words
(_dictis_) in it; for λεκτὸν means _dictio_. And dialectic follows
after the discipline of rhetoric because they have many things in
common.
Chapter 23. On the difference between the dialectical and the
rhetorical art.
1. Varro, in the nine books of the _Disciplinae_, distinguished
dialectic and rhetoric by the following simile: “Dialectic and
rhetoric are as in man’s hand the closed fist and the open palm, the
former drawing words together, the latter scattering them.”
2. If dialectic is keener in expressing things precisely, rhetoric
is more eloquent in persuading to the belief it desires. The former
seldom appears in the schools, the latter goes without a break [from
the schools] to the law-court. The former gets few students, the
latter often whole peoples.
3. Before they come to the explanation of the Isagoge, philosophers
are wont to give a definition of philosophy, in order that the things
which concern it may be shown more easily.
Chapter 24. On the definition of philosophy.
1. Philosophy is the knowledge of things human and divine, united
with a zeal for right living. It seems to consist of two things,
knowledge and opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account