An Enquiry Into the Origin and Intimate Nature of MalariaWilson, Thomas, active 1795-1858
Science
An Enquiry Into the Origin and Intimate Nature of Malaria
Wilson, Thomas, active 1795-1858
Malaria
“But there exists a class of substances no less fatal than the
preceding, originating in certain decompositions. In a preceding
Chapter (III.) we have inquired into the origin of these poisons, and
shown them to originate in fermentation and putrefaction. Let us apply
the chemical principles regulating these processes to organic matters,
to the products of the animal economy; all the elements of these
matters are derived from the blood, the most complex of all existing
substances. In decomposing, a poison is occasionally produced speedily
mortal when it comes in contact with the blood of the living animal.
The venomous principle produced by decomposing animal bodies is not
always the same: that originating in certain German sausages is quite
peculiar; the person who partakes of this fatal dish dies mummified;
he does not rot or fall to pieces like those who perish from wounds
received in dissecting-rooms; on the contrary, he dries up and withers,
but does not putrify.[50] Liebig, the discoverer of this poison and its
effects on man, states that the venom is destroyed by boiling-water and
alcohol, but that these do not absorb it.
[50] All constitutions are not equally liable to be affected by
morbid poisons. This has been proved as regards dissecting-room
wounds; and as regards typhus, cholera, plague, ague, &c., the matter
admits of no doubt.
Similar in the mode of action on the economy are the poisons of
small-pox, plague, &c. The substances which arrest fermentation and
putrefaction, also neutralize the power of these poisons; but the
essence of these poisons has not yet been obtained in an isolated
form, and thus nothing positive is known of its real nature. One thing
seems certain; contagions, poisons and miasms are not living beings
nor animalcules, any more than yeast. They may be, and probably are,
produced by fermentation, but this is neither caused by nor terminates
in the formation of living animalcules, to which all or any of these
phenomena might be attributed.
A nice distinction has been drawn by a distinguished chemist between a
contagion properly so-called and a miasm. When the disease-producing
matter is the product of a disease, it is a contagion; if it be the
product of putrefaction or of eremacausis of any substance, animal or
vegetable,--does it act by virtue of its chemical character, and not
of its condition (_etat_), in forming a combination, or in causing a
decomposition, it is then a miasm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account