An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
As, by the power we find in ourselves of repeating, as often as we
will, any idea of space, we get the idea of IMMENSITY; so, by being
able to repeat the idea of any length of duration we have in our minds,
with all the endless addition of number, we come by the idea of
ETERNITY. For we find in ourselves, we can no more come to an end of
such repeated ideas than we can come to the end of number; which every
one perceives he cannot. But here again it is another question, quite
different from our having an IDEA of eternity, to know whether there
were ANY REAL BEING, whose duration has been eternal. And as to this, I
say, he that considers something now existing, must necessarily come to
Something eternal. But having spoke of this in another place, I shall
say here no more of it, but proceed on to some other considerations of
our idea of infinity.
6. Why other Ideas are not capable of Infinity.
If it be so, that our idea of infinity be got from the power we observe
in ourselves of repeating, without end, our own ideas, it may be
demanded,—Why we do not attribute infinity to other ideas, as well as
those of space and duration; since they may be as easily, and as often,
repeated in our minds as the other: and yet nobody ever thinks of
infinite sweetness or infinite whiteness, though he can repeat the idea
of sweet or white, as frequently as those of a yard or a day? To which
I answer,—All the ideas that are considered as having parts, and are
capable of increase by the addition of an equal or less parts, afford
us, by their repetition, the idea of infinity; because, with this
endless repetition, there is continued an enlargement of which there
CAN be no end. But for other ideas it is not so. For to the largest
idea of extension or duration that I at present have, the addition of
any the least part makes an increase; but to the perfectest idea I have
of the whitest whiteness, if I add another of a less equal whiteness,
(and of a whiter than I have, I cannot add the idea,) it makes no
increase, and enlarges not my idea at all; and therefore the different
ideas of whiteness, &c. are called degrees. For those ideas that
consist of part are capable of being augmented by every addition of the
least part; but if you take the idea of white, which one parcel of snow
yielded yesterday to our sight, and another idea of white from another
parcel of snow you see to-day, and put them together in your mind, they
embody, as it were, all run into one, and the idea of whiteness is not
at all increased and if we add a less degree of whiteness to a greater,
we are so far from increasing, that we diminish it. Those ideas that
consist not of parts cannot be augmented to what proportion men please,
or be stretched beyond what they have received by their senses; but
space, duration, and number, being capable of increase by repetition,
leave in the mind an idea of endless room for more; nor can we conceive
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account