An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
But, in the way to it, it will be necessary to premise, that, though I
have above endeavoured to express the act of volition, by CHOOSING,
PREFERRING, and the like terms, that signify desire as well as
volition, for want of other words to mark that act of the mind whose
proper name is WILLING or VOLITION; yet, it being a very simple act,
whosoever desires to understand what it is, will better find it by
reflecting on his own mind, and observing what it does when it wills,
than by any variety of articulate sounds whatsoever. This caution of
being careful not to be misled by expressions that do not enough keep
up the difference between the WILL and several acts of the mind that
are quite distinct from it, I think the more necessary, because I find
the will often confounded with several of the affections, especially
DESIRE, and one put for the other; and that by men who would not
willingly be thought not to have had very distinct notions of things,
and not to have writ very clearly about them. This, I imagine, has been
no small occasion of obscurity and mistake in this matter; and
therefore is, as much as may be, to be avoided. For he that shall turn
his thoughts inwards upon what passes in his mind when he wills, shall
see that the will or power of volition is conversant about nothing but
our own ACTIONS; terminates there; and reaches no further; and that
volition is nothing but that particular determination of the mind,
whereby, barely by a thought, the mind endeavours to give rise,
continuation, or stop, to any action which it takes to be in its power.
This, well considered, plainly shows that the will is perfectly
distinguished from desire; which, in the very same action, may have a
quite contrary tendency from that which our will sets us upon. A man,
whom I cannot deny, may oblige me to use persuasions to another, which,
at the same time I am speaking, I may wish may not prevail on him. In
this case, it is plain the will and desire run counter. I will the
action; that tends one way, whilst my desire tends another, and that
the direct contrary way. A man who, by a violent fit of the gout in his
limbs, finds a doziness in his head, or a want of appetite in his
stomach removed, desires to be eased too of the pain of his feet or
hands, (for wherever there is pain, there is a desire to be rid of it,)
though yet, whilst he apprehends that the removal of the pain may
translate the noxious humour to a more vital part, his will is never
determined to any one action that may serve to remove this pain. Whence
it is evident that desiring and willing are two distinct acts of the
mind; and consequently, that the will, which is but the power of
volition, is much more distinct from desire.
31. Uneasiness determines the Will.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account