An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
I agree, the more probable opinion is, that this consciousness is
annexed to, and the affection of, one individual immaterial substance.
But let men, according to their diverse hypotheses, resolve of that as
they please. This every intelligent being, sensible of happiness or
misery, must grant—that there is something that is HIMSELF, that he is
concerned for, and would have happy; that this self has existed in a
continued duration more than one instant, and therefore it is possible
may exist, as it has done, months and years to come, without any
certain bounds to be set to its duration; and may be the same self, by
the same consciousness continued on for the future. And thus, by this
consciousness he finds himself to be the same self which did such and
such an action some years since, by which he comes to be happy or
miserable now. In all which account of self, the same numerical
SUBSTANCE is not considered a making the same self; but the same
continued CONSCIOUSNESS, in which several substances may have been
united, and again separated from it, which, whilst they continued in a
vital union with that wherein this consciousness then resided, made a
part of that same self. Thus any part of our bodies, vitally united to
that which is conscious in us, makes a part of ourselves: but upon
separation from the vital union by which that consciousness is
communicated, that which a moment since was part of ourselves, is now
no more so than a part of another man’s self is a part of me: and it is
not impossible but in a little time may become a real part of another
person. And so we have the same numerical substance become a part of
two different persons; and the same person preserved under the change
of various substances. Could we suppose any spirit wholly stripped of
all its memory of consciousness of past actions, as we find our minds
always are of a great part of ours, and sometimes of them all; the
union or separation of such a spiritual substance would make no
variation of personal identity, any more than that of any particle of
matter does. Any substance vitally united to the present thinking being
is a part of that very same self which now is; anything united to it by
a consciousness of former actions, makes also a part of the same self,
which is the same both then and now.
28. Person a forensic Term.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account