An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
Whether the rule to which, as to a touchstone, we bring our voluntary
actions, to examine them by, and try their goodness, and accordingly to
name them, which is, as it were, the mark of the value we set upon
them: whether, I say, we take that rule from the fashion of the
country, or the will of a law-maker, the mind is easily able to observe
the relation any action hath to it, and to judge whether the action
agrees or disagrees with the rule; and so hath a notion of moral
goodness or evil, which is either conformity or not conformity of any
action to that rule: and therefore is often called moral rectitude.
This rule being nothing but a collection of several simple ideas, the
conformity thereto is but so ordering the action, that the simple ideas
belonging to it may correspond to those which the law requires. And
thus we see how moral beings and notions are founded on, and terminated
in, these simple ideas we have received from sensation or reflection.
For example: let us consider the complex idea we signify by the word
murder: and when we have taken it asunder, and examined all the
particulars, we shall find them to amount to a collection of simple
ideas derived from reflection or sensation, viz. First, from REFLECTION
on the operations of our own minds, we have the ideas of willing,
considering, purposing beforehand, malice, or wishing ill to another;
and also of life, or perception, and self-motion. Secondly, from
SENSATION we have the collection of those simple sensible ideas which
are to be found in a man, and of some action, whereby we put an end to
perception and motion in the man; all which simple ideas are
comprehended in the word murder. This collection of simple ideas, being
found by me to agree or disagree with the esteem of the country I have
been bred in, and to be held by most men there worthy praise or blame,
I call the action virtuous or vicious: if I have the will of a supreme
invisible Lawgiver for my rule, then, as I supposed the action
commanded or forbidden by God, I call it good or evil, sin or duty: and
if I compare it to the civil law, the rule made by the legislative
power of the country, I call it lawful or unlawful, a crime or no
crime. So that whencesoever we take the rule of moral actions; or by
what standard soever we frame in our minds the ideas of virtues or
vices, they consist only, and are made up of collections of simple
ideas, which we originally received from sense or reflection: and their
rectitude or obliquity consists in the agreement or disagreement with
those patterns prescribed by some law.
15. Moral actions may be regarded either absolutely, or as ideas of
relation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account