An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
Secondly, That in relations, we have for the most part, if not always,
as clear a notion of THE RELATION as we have of THOSE SIMPLE IDEAS
WHEREIN IT IS FOUNDED: agreement or disagreement, whereon relation
depends, being things whereof we have commonly as clear ideas as of any
other whatsoever; it being but the distinguishing simple ideas, or
their degrees one from another, without which we could have no distinct
knowledge at all. For, if I have a clear idea of sweetness, light, or
extension, I have, too, of equal, or more, or less, of each of these:
if I know what it is for one man to be born of a woman, viz. Sempronia,
I know what it is for another man to be born of the same woman
Sempronia; and so have as clear a notion of brothers as of births, and
perhaps clearer. For if I believed that Sempronia digged Titus out of
the parsley-bed, (as they used to tell children,) and thereby became
his mother; and that afterwards, in the same manner, she digged Caius
out of the parsley-bed, I had as clear a notion of the relation of
brothers between them, as if I had all the skill of a midwife: the
notion that the same woman contributed, as mother, equally to their
births, (though I were ignorant or mistaken in the manner of it,) being
that on which I grounded the relation; and that they agreed in the
circumstance of birth, let it be what it will. The comparing them then
in their descent from the same person, without knowing the particular
circumstances of that descent, is enough to found my notion of their
having, or not having, the relation of brothers. But though the ideas
of PARTICULAR RELATIONS are capable of being as clear and distinct in
the minds of those who will duly consider them as those of mixed modes,
and more determinate than those of substances: yet the names belonging
to relation are often of as doubtful and uncertain signification as
those of substances or mixed modes; and much more than those of simple
ideas. Because relative words, being the marks of this comparison,
which is made only by men’s thoughts, and is an idea only in men’s
minds, men frequently apply them to different comparisons of things,
according to their own imaginations; which do not always correspond
with those of others using the same name.
20. The Notion of Relation is the same, whether the Rule any Action is
compared to be true or false.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account