An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
The causes of obscurity, in simple ideas, seem to be either dull
organs; or very slight and transient impressions made by the objects;
or else a weakness in the memory, not able to retain them as received.
For to return again to visible objects, to help us to apprehend this
matter. If the organs, or faculties of perception, like wax
over-hardened with cold, will not receive the impression of the seal,
from the usual impulse wont to imprint it; or, like wax of a temper too
soft, will not hold it well, when well imprinted; or else supposing the
wax of a temper fit, but the seal not applied with a sufficient force
to make a clear impression: in any of these cases, the print left by
the seal will be obscure. This, I suppose, needs no application to make
it plainer.
4. Distinct and confused, what.
As a clear idea is that whereof the mind has such a full and evident
perception, as it does receive from an outward object operating duly on
a well-disposed organ, so a DISTINCT idea is that wherein the mind
perceives a difference from all other; and a CONFUSED idea is such an
one as is not sufficiently distinguishable from another, from which it
ought to be different.
5. Objection.
If no idea be confused, but such as is not sufficiently distinguishable
from another from which it should be different, it will be hard, may
any one say, to find anywhere a CONFUSED idea. For, let any idea be as
it will, it can be no other but such as the mind perceives it to be;
and that very perception sufficiently distinguishes it from all other
ideas, which cannot be other, i.e. different, without being perceived
to be so. No idea, therefore, can be undistinguishable from another
from which it ought to be different, unless you would have it different
from itself: for from all other it is evidently different.
6. Confusion of Ideas is in Reference to their Names.
To remove this difficulty, and to help us to conceive aright what it is
that makes the confusion ideas are at any time chargeable with, we must
consider, that things ranked under distinct names are supposed
different enough to be distinguished, that so each sort by its peculiar
name may be marked, and discoursed of apart upon any occasion: and
there is nothing more evident, than that the greatest part of different
names are supposed to stand for different things. Now every idea a man
has, being visibly what it is, and distinct from all other ideas but
itself; that which makes it confused, is, when it is such that it may
as well be called by another name as that which it is expressed by; the
difference which keeps the things (to be ranked under those two
different names) distinct, and makes some of them belong rather to the
one and some of them to the other of those names, being left out; and
so the distinction, which was intended to be kept up by those different
names, is quite lost.
7. Defaults which make this Confusion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account