An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
Confusion making it a difficulty to separate two things that should be
separated, concerns always two ideas; and those most which most
approach one another. Whenever, therefore, we suspect any idea to be
confused, we must examine what other it is in danger to be confounded
with, or which it cannot easily be separated from; and that will always
be found an idea belonging to another name, and so should be a
different thing, from which yet it is not sufficiently distinct: being
either the same with it, or making a part of it, or at least as
properly called by that name as the other it is ranked under; and so
keeps not that difference from that other idea which the different
names import.
12. Causes of confused Ideas.
This, I think, is the confusion proper to ideas; which still carries
with it a secret reference to names. At least, if there be any other
confusion of ideas, this is that which most of all disorders men’s
thoughts and discourses: ideas, as ranked under names, being those that
for the most part men reason of within themselves, and always those
which they commune about with others. And therefore where there are
supposed two different ideas, marked by two different names, which are
not as distinguishable as the sounds that stand for them, there never
fails to be confusion; and where any ideas are distinct as the ideas of
those two sounds they are marked by, there can be between them no
confusion. The way to prevent it is to collect and unite into one
complex idea, as precisely as is possible, all those ingredients
whereby it is differenced from others; and to them, so united in a
determinate number and order, apply steadily the same name. But this
neither accommodating men’s ease or vanity, nor serving any design but
that of naked truth, which is not always the thing aimed at, such
exactness is rather to be wished than hoped for. And since the loose
application of names, to undetermined, variable, and almost no ideas,
serves both to cover our own ignorance, as well as to perplex and
confound others, which goes for learning and superiority in knowledge,
it is no wonder that most men should use it themselves, whilst they
complain of it in others. Though I think no small part of the confusion
to be found in the notions of men might, by care and ingenuity, be
avoided, yet I am far from concluding it everywhere wilful. Some ideas
are so complex, and made up of so many parts, that the memory does not
easily retain the very same precise combination of simple ideas under
one name: much less are we able constantly to divine for what precise
complex idea such a name stands in another man’s use of it. From the
first of these, follows confusion in a man’s own reasonings and
opinions within himself; from the latter, frequent confusion in
discoursing and arguing with others. But having more at large treated
of Words, their defects, and abuses, in the following Book, I shall
here say no more of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account