An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2Locke, John
Philosophy
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1: MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
Locke, John
Knowledge, Theory of -- Early works to 1800
This resistance, whereby it keeps other bodies out of the space which
it possesses, is so great, that no force, how great soever, can
surmount it. All the bodies in the world, pressing a drop of water on
all sides, will never be able to overcome the resistance which it will
make, soft as it is, to their approaching one another, till it be
removed out of their way: whereby our idea of solidity is distinguished
both from pure space, which is capable neither of resistance nor
motion; and from the ordinary idea of hardness. For a man may conceive
two bodies at a distance, so as they may approach one another, without
touching or displacing any solid thing, till their superficies come to
meet; whereby, I think, we have the clear idea of space without
solidity. For (not to go so far as annihilation of any particular body)
I ask, whether a man cannot have the idea of the motion of one single
body alone, without any other succeeding immediately into its place? I
think it is evident he can: the idea of motion in one body no more
including the idea of motion in another, than the idea of a square
figure in one body includes the idea of a square figure in another. I
do not ask, whether bodies do so EXIST, that the motion of one body
cannot really be without the motion of another. To determine this
either way, is to beg the question for or against a VACUUM. But my
question is,—whether one cannot have the IDEA of one body moved, whilst
others are at rest? And I think this no one will deny. If so, then the
place it deserted gives us the idea of pure space without solidity;
whereinto any other body may enter, without either resistance or
protrusion of anything. When the sucker in a pump is drawn, the space
it filled in the tube is certainly the same whether any other body
follows the motion of the sucker or not: nor does it imply a
contradiction that, upon the motion of one body, another that is only
contiguous to it should not follow it. The necessity of such a motion
is built only on the supposition that the world is full; but not on the
distinct IDEAS of space and solidity, which are as different as
resistance and not resistance, protrusion and not protrusion. And that
men have ideas of space without a body, their very disputes about a
vacuum plainly demonstrate, as is shown in another place.
4. From Hardness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account