An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of AssentNewman, John Henry
Religion
An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent
Newman, John Henry
Faith; Theism
First, as to fallibility and infallibility. It is very common,
doubtless, especially in religious controversy, to confuse
infallibility with certitude, and to argue that, since we have not the
one, we have not the other, for that no one can claim to be certain on
any point, who is not infallible about all; but the two words stand
for things quite distinct from each other. For example, I remember for
certain what I did yesterday, but still my memory is not infallible; I
am quite clear that two and two makes four, but I often make mistakes
in long addition sums. I have no doubt whatever that John or Richard
is my true friend, but I have before now trusted those who failed me,
and I may do so again before I die. A certitude is directed to this
or that particular proposition; it is not a faculty or gift, but a
disposition of mind relatively to a definite case which is before
me. Infallibility, on the contrary, is just that which certitude is
not; it is a faculty or gift, and relates, not to some one truth in
particular, but to all possible propositions in a given subject-matter.
We ought in strict propriety, to speak, not of infallible acts, but of
acts of infallibility. A belief or opinion as little admits of being
called infallible, as a deed can correctly be called immortal. A deed
is done and over; it may be great, momentous, effective, anything but
immortal; it is its fame, it is the work which it brings to pass, which
is immortal, not the deed itself. And as a deed is good or bad, but
never immortal, so a belief, opinion, or certitude is true or false,
but never infallible. We cannot speak of things which exist or things
which once were, as if they were something _in posse_. It is persons
and rules that are infallible, not what is brought out into act, or
committed to paper. A man is infallible, whose words are always true; a
rule is infallible, if it is unerring in all its possible applications.
An infallible authority is certain in every particular case that may
arise; but a man who is certain in some one definite case, is not on
that account infallible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account