An Essay on Colophons, with Specimens and TranslationsPollard, Alfred W. (Alfred William)
History
An Essay on Colophons, with Specimens and Translations
Pollard, Alfred W. (Alfred William)
Books -- History -- 1450-1600; Colophons; Incunabula -- Bibliography
Opus pene diuinum celeberrimi vtriusque censure interpretis d.
Petri de Ancharano in materia statutorum super caput canonum
statuta de constitutionibus, quod prius Rome tum Bononie
Impressum fuerat, adeo corruptum atque inemendatum fuerat
vitio scriptorum et impressorum incuria vt vix tanti viri opus
obtenebratum foret: nunc vero per Benedictum Hectoris librarium
prius magna arte castigatum, demum originali proprio reperto
enucleatius emendatum, editum est, quo si vera fateri licet
et multa frustra addita detraxit et maiora detracta addidit
impressitque fideliter in eadem ciuitate Bononie. Anno Domini
M.cccc.lxxxxiij. tertio nonas Augusti.
The little less than divine work of the most famous interpreter
of both codes, Dom. Petrus de Ancharano, in the matter of the
statutes, on the chapter “Canonum statuta de constitutionibus,”
which first at Rome, afterwards at Bologna, had been printed,
by the fault of copyists and the carelessness of the printers,
so corruptly and with so little correction that the work of so
great a man was hardly shadowed out, now, on the other hand, by
Benedictus Hectoris, stationer, has first with great skill been
corrected and then by the discovery of the author’s original
more purely emended, and so published, whereby, if truth may
be told, he has both removed many vain additions and has added
more things that had been removed, and has faithfully printed
it in the same city of Bologna in the year of the Lord 1493, on
August 3d.
Legal works are usually crabbed reading in themselves, and in the
fifteenth century were made infinitely more so by the multiplicity of
contractions used in printing them. It might seem natural, therefore,
that there should be a special difficulty in obtaining correctness
in these texts. But, as a matter of fact, to whatever department of
knowledge we turn, we shall still find the fifteenth-century editor
exclaiming against the wickedness of his predecessors. Thus, if we go
to divinity, we may find as loud complaints as any law lecturer could
formulate in the colophon to the Hagenau edition of Gabriel Biel’s sermon
on the Lord’s Passion.
Dominice passionis trium partium notabilium sermo preclarus
domini Gabrielis Biel supranotati. Qui olim negligenter: ex
mendoso exemplari: et sub falso titulo impressus, postea
emendatus ex originali et per prefatum Florentium diel
diligenter revisus: in laudem altissimi innovatus clariusque
interstinctus atque emendatus: non modo in sententiarum
quarundam defectibus: verum etiam in orthographia. Et in
imperiali opido hagenau impressus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account