[364:1] Hist. t. 3, p. 312. [364:2] Mem. Eccl. t. 6, p. 83. [366:1] Galland. t. 3, p. 673, note 3. [366:2] Vid. Preface to Oxford Transl. of Tertullian, where the character of his mind is admirably drawn out. [369:1] Infra, pp. 411-415, &c. [370:1] Orig. c. Cels. vii. 63, viii. 17 (vid. not. Bened. in loc.), August. Ep. 102, 16; Minuc. F. 10, and 32; Tertull. de Orat. fin. ad Uxor. i. fin. Euseb. Hist. viii. 2; Clem. Strom. vii. 6, p. 846. [370:2] Tertull. de Cor. 3; Just. Apol. i. 65; Minuc. F. 20; Julian ap. Cyr. vi. p. 194, Spanh. [371:1] Epp. 102, 18. [371:2] Contr. Faust. 20, 23. [371:3] Lact. ii. 15, 16; Tertull. Spect. 12; Origen, c. Cels. vii. 64-66, August. Ep. 102, 18; Contr. Faust. xx. 23; Hieron. c. Vigil. 8. [372:1] Vit. Thaum. p. 1006. [373:1] V. Const. iii. 1, iv. 23, &c. [373:2] According to Dr. E. D. Clarke, Travels, vol. i. p. 352. [376:1] De Imag. i. 24. [377:1] Ibid. ii. 11. 14. [378:1] Hom. xii. in Cor. 1, Oxf. Tr. [378:2] Fleury, Hist. xx. 11, Oxf. Tr. CHAPTER IX. APPLICATION OF THE FOURTH NOTE OF A TRUE DEVELOPMENT. LOGICAL SEQUENCE. Logical Sequence has been set down above as a fourth test of fidelity in development, and shall now be briefly illustrated in the history of Christian doctrine. That is, I mean to give instances of one doctrine leading to another; so that, if the former be admitted, the latter can hardly be denied, and the latter can hardly be called a corruption without taking exception to the former. And I use "logical sequence" in contrast both to that process of incorporation and assimilation which was last under review, and also to that principle of science, which has put into order and defended the developments after they have been made. Accordingly it will include any progress of the mind from one judgment to another, as, for instance, by way of moral fitness, which may not admit of analysis into premiss and conclusion. Thus St. Peter argued in the case of Cornelius and his friends, "Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?" Such is the series of doctrinal truths, which start from the dogma of our Lord's Divinity, and again from such texts of Scripture as "Thou art Peter," and which I should have introduced here, had I not already used them for a previous purpose in the Fourth Chapter. I shall confine myself then for an example to the instance of the developments which follow on the consideration of sin after Baptism, a subject which was touched upon in the same Chapter. § 1. _Pardons._