An essay towards a natural history of serpentsOwen, Charles
History
An essay towards a natural history of serpents
Owen, Charles
Serpent worship -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Early works to 1800; Serpents -- Religious aspects -- Early works to 1800
_VARRO_ was of Opinion, that all gallant and heroick Men should believe
themselves, tho’ falsly, to issue from the Gods ... that upon this
Supposition, they might attempt great things with more Courage, and
prosecute them with more Ardency; and tho’ the Motive was but imaginary,
yet might produce glorious Effects[428]. When _Varro_ writ this, ’tis
probable he had _Alexander the Great_ in his view.
Footnote 428:
Ex Diis genitos—_Aug. de Civitate Dei._ cap. 4.
Such is their Opinion of their King in _China_, that they think he is
descended from the Race of some Demi-God, and so adore him accordingly.
They believe there is some Divinity in his Blood, in so much that he
never marries any but his next Relatives, for fear of staining the Royal
Blood[429].
Footnote 429:
_Howel_’s _Londinopolis_. p. 384.
Among the Antients, Serpents were Emblems of Power; therefore
_Epaminondas_, the brave _Theban_ General, to encourage his Army against
a powerful Enemy, _bruised the Head of a Serpent_ before them as a
Prognostick of Victory.
Thus King _James_ I. tho’ the _Dupe of all Christendom_, says a certain
Gentleman, yet was the grand Idol of the Court-Clergy. That Pedantry
which would have brought a School-Boy under the just Discipline of the
Rod, in him was represented by his parasitical Preferment-hunting
Ecclesiasticks, as divine Eloquence, and the Inspiration of the
Almighty....
CHAPTER VI.
_Reasons for worshipping hurtful as well as useful Creatures, founded on
a Notion of two eternal contrary Principles: They believe God was
good, and could not be the Author of moral Evil, therefore fram’d
the Ditheistical Doctrine; an Error, espoused by some primitive
Christians, confuted by the Sentence past upon the Serpent. Reasons
for worshipping different Species of Animals by the_ Egyptians.
Whence arises the Honour given by Heathens to different Species of
Beings, to the noxious and hurtful, as well as to the salutary and
beneficent Tribe?
Probably, it might be from their observing the _Mixtures of Good and
Evil_ in the visible Creation, when as yet in their infantile State of
Knowledge: The reason of this they could not otherwise account for, but
by giving into the Notion of _two distinct independent governing
Powers_; the one a good, the other an evil Genius: accordingly they
worshipped Creatures that were useful, as being the Ministers of the
good Genius; and those that were hurtful they paid Homage to, out of
servile Fear, and to ingratiate themselves into their Favour. In the
Morning they worshipped the _celestial Gods_; in the Evening, the
_infernal_: On the Plain they worshipped the terrestrial Gods, on Hills
the supernatural; in Grotos and Caves, the infernal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account