An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of JesusGreenleaf, Simon
Religion
An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice: With an Account of the Trial of Jesus
Greenleaf, Simon
Apologetics; Authority -- Religious aspects; Bible. Gospels -- Evidences, authority, etc.; Jesus Christ -- Trial
§ 41. The narratives of the sacred writers, both Jewish and Christian,
abound in examples of this kind of evidence, the value of which is hardly
capable of being properly estimated. It does not, as has been already
remarked, amount to mathematical demonstration; nor is this degree of
proof justly demandable in any question of moral conduct. In all human
transactions, the highest degree of assurance to which we can arrive,
short of the evidence of our own senses, is that of probability. The most
that can be asserted is, that the narrative is more likely to be true than
false; and it may be in the highest degree more likely, but still be short
of absolute mathematical certainty. Yet this very probability may be so
great as to satisfy the mind of the most cautious, and enforce the assent
of the most reluctant and unbelieving. If it is such as usually satisfies
reasonable men, in matters of ordinary transaction, it is all which the
greatest sceptic has a right to require; for it is by such evidence alone
that our rights are determined, in the civil tribunals; and on no other
evidence do they proceed, even in capital cases. Thus, where a house had
been feloniously broken open with a knife, the blade of which was broken
and left in the window, and the mutilated knife itself, the parts
perfectly agreeing, was found in the pocket of the accused, who gave no
satisfactory explanation of the fact, no reasonable doubt remained of his
participation in the crime. And where a murder had been committed by
shooting with a pistol, and the prisoner was connected with the
transaction by proof that the wadding of the pistol was part of a letter
addressed to him, the remainder of which was found upon his person, no
juror’s conscience could have reproached him for assenting to the verdict
of condemnation.(67) Yet the evidence, in both cases, is but the evidence
of circumstances; amounting, it is true, to the highest degree of
probability, but yet not utterly inconsistent with the innocence of the
accused. The evidence which we have of the great facts of the Bible
history belongs to this class, that is, it is moral evidence; sufficient
to satisfy any rational mind, by carrying it to the highest degree of
moral certainty. If such evidence will justify the taking away of human
life or liberty, in the one case, surely it ought to be deemed sufficient
to determine our faith in the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account