An Historical Account of the Rise and Progress of the Colonies of South Carolina and Georgia, Volume 1Hewatt, Alexander
History
An Historical Account of the Rise and Progress of the Colonies of South Carolina and Georgia, Volume 1
Hewatt, Alexander
Georgia -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; South Carolina -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
Sir Nathaniel Johnson having advanced so far, was determined to proceed
in spite of every obstacle thrown in his way. He instituted what the
inhabitants of Carolina took to be a high-commission court, like that of
King James the second. It was enacted, that twenty lay-persons be
constituted a corporation for the exercise of ecclesiastical
jurisdiction, with full power to deprive ministers of their livings at
pleasure, not for immorality only, but also for imprudence, or on account
of unreasonable prejudices taken against them. In vain did many persons
complain of this institution, as tearing the ecclesiastical jurisdiction
out of the hands of the bishop of London, in whose diocese the whole
British colonies in America were included. The governor, bent on carrying
into execution the favourite plan of the Palatine, paid little regard to
the uneasy apprehensions of the people. According to the act for erecting
churches, the colony is divided into ten parishes; seven in Berkeley, two
in Colleton, and one in Craven counties. Money is provided for building
churches; lands are granted for glebes and church-yards; and salaries for
the different rectors are fixed and appointed, payable from the
provincial treasury. When these bills were transmitted to England, to be
ratified and confirmed by the Proprietors, John Archdale opposed them,
and insisted, that the Dissenters of Carolina had not yet forgot the
hardships they suffered in England from acts of uniformity; that the
right of private judgment in religious matters was the birth-right of
every man; that undisturbed liberty of conscience was allowed to every
inhabitant of Carolina by the charter; that acts of conformity, with
penalties annexed to them, have in general proved destructive to the
cause they were intended to promote, and were utterly inconsistent with
Protestant principles; and therefore that these bills, so unpopular and
oppressive in Carolina, ought to be repealed, as contrary to sound policy
and religious freedom. The majority of the Proprietors, however, did not
view them in this light, and the debate ran high between them. At length
the Palatine, equally tyrannical as bigotted put an end to the dispute,
by telling Mr. Archdale: "Sir, you are of one opinion, I am of another;
our lives may not be long enough to end the controversy. I am for the
bills, and that is the party that I will head and support." In
consequence of which the acts were ratified by four Proprietors, and the
following letter was sent to Sir Nathaniel Johnson. "Sir, the great and
pious work which you have gone through with such unwearied and steady
zeal, for the honour and worship of Almighty God, we have also finally
perfected on our part; and our ratification of that act for erecting
churches, _&c._ together with duplicates of all other dispatches, we
have forwarded to you by Captain Flavel."
[Sidenote] The petition of Dissenters to the House of Lords.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account