I imagine that the far greater part of all the coin supposed to be in France during the Missisippi scheme, remained in private hands, without ever coming into the bank. My reason for being of this opinion is, Law never could have had more than the value of his original stock, and all the value of notes he had in circulation. It is absurd to imagine he ever should have had the half, or near it; but let me suppose it, The bank stock was 6 millions. The notes he issued were 59 millions. —— In all 65 millions. This is a trifle compared with 1200 millions. Next for the united bank. The time at which the greatest quantity of coin was collected, must have been when all credit failed, that is, on the 21st of May 1720. At that time coin was taken out of commerce: every one was forbid to have above 500 livres in possession; and every operation had been used to call it in. At this time, we know that all the notes coined were issued, except to the value of 461 316 410 livres. Now we have seen that on the 10th of October following, there were in the bank to the value of 707 327 460 livres. Let me, therefore, suppose, that from the 21st of May to the 10th of October, the bank paid away in coin, the difference between these two sums; to wit, 246 011 050 livres. Add to that sum what was then in the bank, viz. 90 000 000 ————————— Sum 336 011 050 This sum is all we possibly can suppose to have been in the bank on the 21st of May, when credit failed. We must reckon this sum of coin at 82 livres 10 sols _per_ marc, the then value; which makes about 8 146 600_l._ sterling. A large sum, no doubt; but little more than ⅕ of 40 millions sterling, the value of 1200 millions of livres, at 60 to the marc, as has been said. Consequently, either those 40 millions sterling were not then in France, or the greatest part of the sum had remained in private hands during this whole operation. In this light I see the Missisippi scheme. I may, no doubt, be mistaken in many things: the lights, or rather the glimmerings, by which I have been conducted through this inquiry, must plead my excuse. But it is not so much facts as principles, I have been investigating through this whole disquisition; and the imperfect account I have been able to give of the _former_, will at least point out, I hope, the notions which the French nation, at that time, had of the _latter_. If the contrast between French principles, and those I have laid down, tend to cast any light upon the subject of paper credit in general, my end is accomplished: if they ever prove of use to mankind, I shall not think my labour lost.