An Introduction to Nature-studyStenhouse, E. (Ernest)
History
An Introduction to Nature-study
Stenhouse, E. (Ernest)
Natural history -- Study and teaching; Nature study
[Pg 252]
There is also a very marked difference in the tongues of the two
animals. The tongue of the cat is rough, with small points directed
backwards. These points are of great help in licking the flesh from
bones; and they also serve as a comb when the cat—which is fastidious
about the cleanliness of its fur—“washes” itself. The tongue of the
dog is smooth and moist.
The inherited habits of the cat and dog.—Very obvious
differences are also to be seen in the habits of the two animals,
and these would be somewhat difficult to explain if we confined our
attention to the domesticated animals only, which live under artificial
conditions. When, however, we consider the wild relatives of the cat
and dog, many of the differences become full of significance. The
wild animals of the cat family, almost without exception, are either
solitary or live in pairs; whereas the wild dogs (wolves, jackals,
etc.) live in packs. The habits which these respective methods of life
entailed have become so firmly implanted in the nature of the race
that even now, after thousands of generations of domestication, they
may be traced. Such inherited habits, which are not dependent upon,
or may be at variance with, present conditions of life, are called
instincts.
We will first see how the ancestral custom of living in organised packs
has left its impress upon the instincts of the domesticated dog. The
first essential to the success of any community of animals—whether
these are bees or rooks, wolves or men—is that all the creatures
composing it shall conform to certain rules, which have for their
object the good of the community and not merely that of the individual.
Acts which promote the wellbeing of the society as a whole are good,
and are directly or indirectly rewarded. Acts which tend to injure the
society as such are bad, and inevitably bring punishment either to the
[Pg 253]
individual offender or, what is worse, to his pack. A distinction
between right and wrong is thus established which would be impossible
to any animal living so solitary a life that its acts affected only
itself. In this manner were aroused the social instinct, the love
of praise and the dread of shame, the lifelong attachment to early
friends, and almost all the other qualities which have so endeared the
dog to mankind; because these qualities resulted naturally from the
ancestral pack-life. Left to itself, the dog loses its nerve, for it is
by nature unfitted for a solitary life. What more woe-begone animal is
ever seen than a lost dog?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account