An Introduction to ShakespeareMacCracken, H. N. (Henry Noble)
General
An Introduction to Shakespeare
MacCracken, H. N. (Henry Noble)
Shakespeare, William, 1564-1616 -- Handbooks, manuals, etc.
+Sources+.--The direct source was probably a short account of Timon in
Plutarch's _Life of Marcus Antonius_. The same story also appears in
Painter's _Palace of Pleasure_, where Shakespeare may have read it.
Both of these accounts, however, contain but a small part of the
material found in the play. Certain details missing in them, such as
the discovery of the gold, etc., are found in _Timon or the
Misanthrope_, a dialogue by Lucian, one of the later of the ancient
Greek writers. As far as we know, Lucian had not been translated into
English at this time; but there were copies of his works in Latin,
French, and Italian. We cannot say whether Shakespeare had read them
or not. In 1842 a play on Timon was printed from an old manuscript
which is supposed to have been written about 1000. This contains a
banquet scene, a faithful steward, and the finding of the gold. This
has the appearance of an academic play rather than one meant for the
public theaters, so it is probable that Shakespeare never heard of it;
but it is barely possible that he knew it and used it as a source.
The most helpful book yet written on the period is: _Shakespearean
Tragedy_, by A. C. Bradley (London, Macmillan, 1910 (1st ed. 1904)).
{196}
CHAPTER XIII
THE PLAYS OF THE FOURTH PERIOD--ROMANTIC TRAGI-COMEDY
No less clear than the interest in tragic themes which attracted the
London audiences for the half-a-dozen years following 1600, is the
shifting of popular approval towards a new form of drama about 1608.
This was the romantic tragi-comedy, a type of drama which puts a theme
of sentimental interest into events and situations that come close to
the tragic. Shakespeare's plays of this type are often called
romances, since they tell a story of the same type found in romantic
novels of the time. His plays contain rather less of the tragic, and
more of fanciful and playful humor than do the plays of the other
famous masters in this type, Beaumont and Fletcher; his characters are
rather more lifelike and appealing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account